skip to main content
article

Navigating on handheld displays: Dynamic versus static peephole navigation

Published:01 December 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Handheld displays leave little space for the visualization and navigation of spatial layouts representing rich information spaces. The most common navigation method for handheld displays is static peephole navigation: The peephole is static and we move the spatial layout behind it (scrolling). A more natural method is dynamic peephole navigation: here, the spatial layout is static and we move the peephole across it. In the experiment reported here, we compared dynamic and static peephole navigation in otherwise similar conditions. Subjects viewed a spatial layout containing two lines on a static display screen. Only a part of the screen---the peephole---was visible. Subjects had to discriminate line length by either moving a dynamic peephole across a static layout of the lines or by moving a dynamic layout behind a static peephole. In both conditions, they used mouse-cursor control to move either the peephole or the lines.Results show significant differences in discrimination performance between conditions when lines are larger than the size of the peephole. Discrimination thresholds for static peephole navigation were 50--75% higher than for dynamic peephole navigation. Furthermore, static peephole navigation took 24% more time than dynamic peephole navigation.

References

  1. Bakker, N. H., Passenier, P. O., and Werkhoven, P. J. 2003. The effects of head-slaved navigation and the use of teleports on spatial orientation in virtual environments (VE). Human Factors 45, 160--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B. 2001. 3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference. Seattle, 434--441. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fitzmaurice, G. W., Zhai, S., and Chignell, M. H. 1993. Virtual reality for palm computers. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 11, 197--218. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Bastin, J., Pasveer, D., and Zhai, S. 2004. View size and pointing difficulty in multi-scale navigation. In Proceedings of the Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) Conference, May 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luce, R. D. and Galanter, E. 1963. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 1, R. D. Luce et al., Eds. Wiley, New York, 191--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nguyen, G. P. and Worring, M. 2004. Optimizing similarity-based visualization in content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICME Special Session Novel Techniques for Browsing in Large Multimedia Collections Conference. Taipei, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., and Tittle, J. S. 1996. The visual perception of three-dimensional length. J. Experi. Psych.: Human Perception Perform., 22, 173--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D. C., Thiel, D., and Van Dantzich, M. 1998. Data mountain: Using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of Conference UIST, 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sutherland, I. 1968. The ultimate display. In Proceedings of the IFIP Congress 2, 506--508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wagner, M. 1985. The metric of visual space. Perception and Psychophys. 38, 483--495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Weber, E. H. 1965. On Weber's law, 1834. In A Source Book in the History of Psychology, R. J. Herrnstem and E. G. Borings, Eds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 64--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Werkhoven, P. and Snippe, H. P. 1996. An efficient adaptive procedure for psychophysical discrimination experiments. Behav. Res. Meth. Instruments Comput. 28, 556--562.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yee, K. 2003. Peephole displays: Pen interaction on spatially aware handheld computers. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Navigating on handheld displays: Dynamic versus static peephole navigation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader