skip to main content
article

Partonomy and taxonomy in object-oriented thinking: junior high school students' perceptions of object-oriented basic concepts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The study presented in this paper explores junior high school students' comprehension of basic OO concepts. It summarizes major (mis)conceptions demonstrated by the students in two main categories: confusion of (1) taxonomic and (2) partonomic hierarchies with classes, objects and their interrelations.

References

  1. Börstler, J. and Sharp, H. (2003). Learning and teaching object technology, Editorial. Computer Science Education, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 243--247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rayside, D. and Campbell, G. T. (2000a). Aristotle and object oriented programming: why modern students need traditional logic. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the 31st SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pp. 237--244 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Rayside, D. and Campbell, G. T. (2000b). An Aristotelian understanding of object-oriented programming. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, pp. 337--353 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tversky, B. (1989). Parts, partonomies, and taxonomies, Developmental Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 983--995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tversky, B. (1990). "Where partonomies and taxonomies meet", in: S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies on Linguistic Categorization, London: Routledge, pp. 334--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts and categories, Journal of experimental psychology: General, Vol. 113, No. 2, pp. 169--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Partonomy and taxonomy in object-oriented thinking: junior high school students' perceptions of object-oriented basic concepts
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
      ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 38, Issue 4
      December 2006
      186 pages
      ISSN:0097-8418
      DOI:10.1145/1189136
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      • cover image ACM Conferences
        ITiCSE-WGR '06: Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education
        June 2006
        99 pages
        ISBN:1595936033
        DOI:10.1145/1189215

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2006

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader