skip to main content
10.1145/1216295.1216325acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Segmenting meetings into agenda items by extracting implicit supervision from human note-taking

Published:28 January 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Splitting a meeting into segments such that each segment contains discussions on exactly one agenda item is useful for tasks such as retrieval and summarization of agenda item discussions. However, accurate topic segmentation of meetings is a difficult task. In this paper, we investigate the idea of acquiring implicit supervision from human meeting participants to solve the segmentation problem. Specifically we have implemented and tested a note taking interface that gives value to users by helping them organize and retrieve their notes easily, but that also extracts a segmentation of the meeting based on note taking behavior. We show that the segmentation so obtained achieves a Pk value of 0.212 which improves upon an unsupervised baseline by 45% relative, and compares favorably with a current state-of-the-art algorithm. Most importantly, we achieve this performance without any features or algorithms in the classic sense.

References

  1. S. Banerjee, C. Rose, and A. I. Rudnicky. The necessity of a meeting recording and playback system, and the benefit of topic-level annotations to meeting browsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Rome, Italy, September 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Banerjee and A. I. Rudnicky. Using simple speech-based features to detect the state of a meeting and the roles of the meeting participants. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech 2004 - ICSLP), Jeju Island, Korea, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Banerjee and A. I. Rudnicky. SmartNotes: Implicit labeling of meeting data through user note-taking and browsing. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Association of Computational Linguistics - Human Languages Technology (NAACL-HLT) - Demonstration Track, New York, NY, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Banerjee and A. I. Rudnicky. A TextTiling based approach to topic boundary detection in meetings. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech 2006 - ICSLP), Pittsburgh, PA, September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Regina Barzilay and Lillian Lee. Catching the drift: Probabilistic content models, with applications to generation and summarization. In HLT-NAACL 2004: Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 113--120, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Beeferman, A. Berger, and J. Lafferty. Statistical models for text segmentation. Machine Learning, 34(1-3):177 -- 210, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Galley, K. McKeown, E. Fosler-Lussier, and Hongyan Jing. Discourse segmentation of multi--party conversation. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, volume 1, pages 562--569, Sapporo, Japan, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Gruenstein, J. Niekrasz, and M. Purver. Meeting structure annotation: Data and tools. In Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Hain, J. Dines, G. Garau, M. Karafiat, D. Moore, V. Wan, R. Ordelman, and S. Renals. Transcription of conference room meetings: An investigation. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Hearst. TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi--paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics, 23(1):33--64, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. F. Metze, Q. Jin, C. Fugen, K. Laskowski, Y. Pan, and T. Schultz. Issues in meeting transcription -- the ISL meeting transcription system. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech 2004 -- ICSLP), Jeju Island, Korea, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Murray, S. Renals, and J. Carletta. Extractive summarization of meeting recordings. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthew Purver, Patrick Ehlen, and John Niekrasz. Shallow discourse structure for action item detection. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL workshop Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech', New York, NY, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matthew Purver, Konrad Körding, Thomas Griffiths, and Joshua Tenenbaum. Unsupervised topic modelling for multi-party spoken discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL), pages 17--24, Sydney, Australia, July 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Paul E. Rybski and Manuela M. Veloso. Using sparse visual data to model human activities in meetings. In Workshop on Modeling Other Agents from Observations, International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Stolcke, C. Wooters, N. Mirghafori, T. Pirinen, I. Bulyko, D. Gelbart, M. Graciarena, S. Otterson, B Peskin, and M. Ostendorf. Progress in meeting recognition: The ICSI-SRI-UW Spring 2004 evaluation system. In NIST RT04 Meeting Recognition Workshop, Montreal, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Luis von Ahn and Laura Dabbish. Labeling images with a computer game. In CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 319--326, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Luis von Ahn, Mihir Kedia, and Manuel Blum. Verbosity: a game for collecting common-sense facts. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 75--78, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Luis von Ahn, Ruoran Liu, and Manuel Blum. Peekaboom: a game for locating objects in images. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 55--64, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Segmenting meetings into agenda items by extracting implicit supervision from human note-taking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '07: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      January 2007
      388 pages
      ISBN:1595934812
      DOI:10.1145/1216295

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 January 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader