skip to main content
10.1145/1226969.1227024acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The feel dimension of technology interaction: exploring tangibles through movement and touch

Published:15 February 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents concepts to extend our understandings of bodily aspects of technology interactions. The aim of the paper is to offer a way of looking at the role our haptic and kinaesthetic senses play in experiencing tangibles. We approach this issue by framing it around how our bodies establish relationships with things. Four themes body-thing dialogue, potential for action, actions in space (consisting of within-reach, out-of-reach) and movement expression are introduced. We discuss the role these themes can play in our thinking about, and exploration for, tangible and non-tangible technology interactions. The idea is that these themes can help us consider, not just how a design or a technology might look, but also how it might feel to use.

References

  1. Berthoz, A. The Brain's Sense of Movement, trans. G. Weiss, Harvard University Press, London, England 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buxton, W. There's More to Interaction Than Meets the Eye: Some Issues in Manual Input, in D. A. Borman & S. W. Draper (eds), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J., USA, (1986), 319--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carello, C. & Turvey, M. T. Rotational Invariants and Dynamic Touch, in M. A. Heller (ed.), Touch, Representation, and Blindness, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000, 27--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Damasio, A. R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, Quill, New York, USA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Djajadiningrat, T., Wensween, S., Frens, J. & Overbeeke, K. Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 5, (2004), 294--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dourish, P. Implications for Design, In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. Where the Action is: the Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fallman, D. Enabling physical collaboration in industrial settings by designing for embodied interaction, In Proc. Latin American conference on HCI, 46, (2003), 41--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gibson, J. J. Observations on active touch, Psychological Review, 69, (1962), 477--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gibson, J. J. The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK, 1986. (Original work published in 1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. Being and Time, trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hornecker, E. & Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction, In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hutchinson, A. Labanotation or Kinetography Laban: the System of Analyzing and Recording Movement, 3rd revised and expanded edn, Theatre Arts Books, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Laban, R. Modern Educational Dance, 3rd ed., Northcote House, Guernsey, Channels Island, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Leder, D. The Absent Body, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Loke, L., Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T. & Edwards, J. Understanding Movement for Interaction Design: Frameworks and Approaches, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (accepted for publication in special issue, 2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McCarthy, J. & Wright, P. Putting 'felt-life' at the centre of human-computer interaction (HCI), Cognition, Technology & Work, 7, 4, (2005), 262--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith, Routledge London, UK and New York, USA, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Moen, J. KinAesthetic Movement Interaction - A Dance-Based Approach to Human Movement, PhD thesis, KTH, Sweden, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nintendo, Wii#8482; Remote and Nunchuk controller, hardware, Nintendo, Redmond, USA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension, Peter Smith, Gloucester, Mass, USA, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Robertson, T. Ethical issues in interaction design. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 2, (2006), 49--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Robertson, T. The Public Availability of Actions and Artefacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, (2002), 299--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Robertson, T. Cooperative Work and Lived Cognition: A Taxonomy of Embodied Action. In Proc. ECSCW 1997, Kluwer Academic Publisher, (1997), 205--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Schiphorst, T. & Andersen, K. Between Bodies: using Experience Modeling to Create Gestural Protocols for Physiological Data Transfer, In Proc. CHI 2004 Fringe, ACM Press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sony, Playstation2® and Eyetoy#8482;, hardware and computer program, London, UK, 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Svanæs, D. Context-Aware Technology: A Phenomenological Perspective, Human Computer Interaction, special issue on context-aware computing, 16, (2001), 379--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Svanæs, D. Understanding Interactivity: Steps to a Phenomenology of Human-Computer Interaction, PhD thesis, NTNU, Norway, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaughan, L. Embodying Design: The Lived Relationship between Artefact, User and the Lived Experience of Design, In Proc. PDC 2006, ACM Press (2006), 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Vedel Jensen, M., Buur, J. & Djajadiningrat, T. Designing the user actions in tangible interaction, In Proc. Critical Computing 2005, ACM Press (2005), 9--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The feel dimension of technology interaction: exploring tangibles through movement and touch

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEI '07: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction
      February 2007
      296 pages
      ISBN:9781595936196
      DOI:10.1145/1226969
      • Conference Chairs:
      • Brygg Ullmer,
      • Albrecht Schmidt

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 February 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader