skip to main content
10.1145/1227310.1227430acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A case for smaller class size with integrated lab for introductory computer science

Published:07 March 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prompted by changes in the numbers and demographics of students enrolled and being retained in computer science, the Department of Computer Science at NC State University is revising its undergraduate curriculum to better meet the needs of its students, and increase student attraction and retention. One set of changes concerns introductory computer science courses (CS1). This paper reports on a study conducted to assess the impact of class size and active learning in our CS1 courses. We find that smaller classes with integrated laboratories improve both learning and retention, as well as satisfaction of the students. Among other benefits, we found retention rates in small classes to be about 20% better than large classes.

References

  1. L. J. Barker and K. Garvin-Doxas, "Making Visible the Behaviors that Influence Learning Environment: A Qualitative Exploration of Computer Science Classrooms," Computer Science Education, vol. 14, pp. 119--145, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. S. Bloom, "The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring," Educational Researcher, vol. 13, pp. 4--16, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. H. Bruning, G. J. Schraw, M. M. Norby and R. R. Ronning, Cognitive Psychology and Instruction., 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. F. Denton and D. McKinney, "Affective factors and student achievement: A quantitative and qualitative study," in Frontiers in Education 2004, pp. T1G-6-11 Vol. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, "Understanding Student Differences," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 57--72, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Fincher and M. Petre, Computer Science Education Research. Taylor & Francis, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Gonzalez, "A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2," in SIGCSE '06: Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2006, pp. 133--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. L. Maxwell and J. S. Lopus, "A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Large and Small Classes in the University," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 17, pp. 167--178, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. McCauley, C. Starr, W. Pharr, R. Stalvey and G. Pothering, "Is CS1 Better with the Same Lecture and Lab Instructor?" SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 54--60, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," J Eng Educ, vol. 93, pp. 223--232, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. H. J. Raimondo, L. Esposito and I. Gershenberg, "Introductory Class Size and Student Performance in Intermediate Theory Courses," Journal of Economic Education, vol. 21, pp. 369--382, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Vegso, "Interest in CS as a Major Drops Among Incoming Freshmen," Computing Research News, vol. 17, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Yasuhara, "Choosing Computer Science: Women at the Start of the Undergraduate Pipeline," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Zweben, "2004-05 Taulbee Survey: Ph.D. Production at an All-Time High with More New Graduates Going Abroad; Undergraduate Enrollments Again Drop Significantly", Computing Research News, Vol. 18 No. 3, May 2006, http://www.cra.org/CRN/articles/may06/taulbee.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A case for smaller class size with integrated lab for introductory computer science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '07: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
      March 2007
      634 pages
      ISBN:1595933611
      DOI:10.1145/1227310

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader