skip to main content
10.1145/1227310.1227484acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Opening the door of the computer science classroom: the disciplinary commons

Published:07 March 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Disciplinary Commons project had two primary objectives: to document and share knowledge about teaching and student learning in Computer Science (CS) classrooms, and to establish practices for the scholarship of teaching by making it public, peer-reviewed, and amenable for future use and development by other educators. The mechanism for achieving these goals was through a series of monthly meetings involving Computer Science faculty, one cohort of ten CS faculty in the US and one cohort of twenty in the UK. Meetings were focused on the teaching and learning within participants' classrooms, with each person documenting their teaching in a course portfolio. Surveyed on completing the project, participants discussed the value of the Disciplinary Commons in providing the time and structure to systematically reflect upon their practice, to exchange concrete ideas for teaching their courses with other CS educators in the discipline, to learn skills that apply directly to course and program evaluation, and to meet colleagues teaching CS at other institutions.

References

  1. Huber, M.T. Disciplines and the Development of a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the United States of America. LTSN Discussion paper, 2002. Downloaded on 22 Nov. 2004 from http://www.ltsn.ac.uk/application.asp?section=generic&app=resources.asp&process=full_record&id=160Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Shulman, L. Teaching as community property. Change, 25, 6, (1993), 6--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Schön, D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Popper, K. Campbell on the Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge. In Radnitzky, G. and Bartley III, W. (eds). Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. Open Court, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Broad, B. What We Really Value. Utah State University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hutchings, P. (ed.) The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine Their Teaching to Advance Practice and Improve Student Learning. American Association for Higher Education, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, D. Putting the Focus on Student Learning. In Hutchings, P. (ed.) The Course Portfolio. American Association for Higher Education, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Selden, P. The Teaching Portfolio: A Practical Guide to Improved Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions, Anker Publishing Company, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shulman, L. Course Anatomy. In Hutchings, P. (ed.) The Course Portfolio. American Association for Higher Education, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wenger, E. Communities of Pra;ctice: Learnin, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Robinson, J. Course Portfolios as Scaffolding for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the Inaugural conference of the International Society of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Bloominton, Indiana, USA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Opening the door of the computer science classroom: the disciplinary commons

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '07: Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 2007
        634 pages
        ISBN:1595933611
        DOI:10.1145/1227310

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 March 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader