skip to main content
10.1145/1243441.1243468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Accessibility in non-professional web authoring tools: a missed web 2.0 opportunity?

Published:07 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

The advent of Web 2.0 technologies, and the increased participation of users in personalized web experiences, has created a need for new web authoring tools intended for use by non-professional web authors. These tools represent a prime opportunity for including accessibility features early in the tool design process. The results from an accessibility evaluation of one of these tools demonstrates that such opportunities could be easily missed.

References

  1. Bart Bauwens, Jan Engelen, Filip Evenepoel, Chris Tobin, and Tom Wesley. Increasing access to information for the print disabled through electronic documents in sgml. In ASSETS, pages 55--61. ACM, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ben Caldwell, Wendy Chisholm, John Slatin, and Gregg Vanderheiden. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (draft). Online Website at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ Retrieved February, 2007, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wendy Chisholm, Gregg Vanderheiden, and Ian Jacobs. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Website; Retireved in March, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Disability Rights Commission. The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Google. Page creator. Product Website; Retrieved in March, 2007 from http://pages.google.com, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lev Grossman. Time's Person of the Year: You. Time Magazine, 168(26), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Apple Inc. iWeb. Product Website; Retrieved in March, 2007 from http://www.apple.com/ilife/iweb/, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Web Accessibility Initiative. Level A Conformance to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Website; Retrieved in March, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1A-Conformance, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jutta Treviranus, Charles McCathieNevile, Ian Jacobs, and Jan Richards. Authoring tool accessibility guidelines 1.0. W3C Website; Retrieved in March, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accessibility in non-professional web authoring tools: a missed web 2.0 opportunity?

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)
              May 2007
              179 pages
              ISBN:1595935908
              DOI:10.1145/1243441

              Copyright © 2007 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 7 May 2007

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              W4A '07 Paper Acceptance Rate11of27submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader