skip to main content
10.1145/1248377.1248424acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Speed scaling on parallel processors

Published:09 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we investigate algorithmic instruments leading to low powerconsumption in computing devices. While previous work on energy-efficient algorithms has mostly focused on single processor environments, in this paper we investigate multi-processor settings. We study the basic problem of scheduling a set of jobs, each specified by a release time, a deadline and a processing volume, on variable speed processors so as to minimize the total energy consumption. We first settle the complexity of speed scaling with unit size jobs. More specifically, we devise a polynomial time algorithm for agreeable deadlines and prove NP-hardness results for arbitrary release dates and deadlines. For the latter setting we also develop a polynomial time algorithm achieving a constant factor approximation guarantee that is independent of the number of processors. Additionally, we study speed scaling of jobs with arbitrary processing requirements and, again, develop constant factor approximation algorithms. We finally transform our offline algorithms into constant competitive online strategies.

References

  1. S. Albers and H. Fujiwara. Energy-efficient algorithms for flow time minimization. Proc. 23rd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), Springer LNCS 3884, 621--633, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Augustine, S. Irani and C. Swamy. Optimal power-down strategies. Proc. 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 530--539, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Bansal, T. Kimbrel and K. Pruhs. Dynamic speed scaling to manage energy and temperature. Proc. 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 520--529, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Baptiste. Scheduling unit tasks to minimize the number of idle periods: A polynomial time algorithm for offline dynamic power management. Proc. 17th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 364--367, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L.A. Barroso. The price of performance. ACM Queue, 3(7), September 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Bansal and K. Pruhs. Speed scaling to manage temperature. Proc. 22nd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), Springer LNCS 3404, 460--471, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J.-J. Chen, H.-R. Hsu, K.-H. Chuang, C.-L. Yang, A.-C. Pang and T.-W. Kuo. Multiprocessor energy efficient scheduling with task migration considerations. Proc. 16th Euromicro Conference of Real-Time Systems, 101--108, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J.-J. Chen, T.-W. Kuo, H.-I. Lu. Power-saving scheduling for weakly dynamic voltage scaling devices. Proc. 9th International Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures, Springer LNCS 3608, 338--349, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D.S. Hochbaum and D.B. Shmoys. Using dual approximation algorithms for scheduling problems: Theoretical and practical results. Journal of the ACM, 34:144--162, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Intel pressroom. http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/teraflops/ or http://download.intel.com/pressroom/kits/Teraflops/Teraflops Research Chip Overview.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Irani, S. Shukla and R. Gupta. Algorithms for power savings. Proc. 14th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 37--46, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Pruhs, R. van Stee, P. Uthaisombut. Speed scaling of tasks with precedence constraints. Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA), Springer LNCS 3879, 307--319, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Pruhs, P. Uthaisombut and G. Woeginger. Getting the best response for your erg. Proc. 9th Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory (SWAT), Springer LNCS 3111, 15--25, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D.D. Sleator und R.E. Tarjan. Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules. Communications of the ACM, 28:202--208, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. F. Yao, A. Demers and S. Shenker. A scheduling model for reduced CPU energy. Proc. 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 374--382, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Speed scaling on parallel processors

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SPAA '07: Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures
          June 2007
          376 pages
          ISBN:9781595936677
          DOI:10.1145/1248377

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 June 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate447of1,461submissions,31%

          Upcoming Conference

          SPAA '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader