skip to main content
10.1145/1255175.1255198acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web?

Published:18 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social bookmarking is an emerging type of a Web service that helps users share, classify, and discover interesting resources. In this paper, we explore the concept of an enhanced search, in which data from social bookmarking systems is exploited for enhancing search in the Web. We propose combining the widely used link-based ranking metric with the one derived using social bookmarking data. First, this increases the precision of a standard link-based search by incorporating popularity estimates from aggregated data of bookmarking users. Second, it provides an opportunity for extending the search capabilities of existing search engines. Individual contributions of bookmarking users as well as the general statistics of their activities are used here for a new kind of a complex search where contextual, temporal or sentiment-related information is used. We investigate the usefulness of social bookmarking systems for the purpose of enhancing Web search through a series of experiments done on datasets obtained from social bookmarking systems. Next, we show the prototype system that implements the proposed approach and we present some preliminary results.

References

  1. E. Amitay, D. Carmel, M. Herscovici, R. Lempel, and A. Soffer. Trend Detection Through Temporal Link Analysis. In Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 2004, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Baeza-Yates, C. Castillo and F. Saint-Jean. Web Dynamics, Structure and Page Quality. In M. Levene and A. Poulovassilis (eds.) "Web Dynamics", Springer, 2004, 93--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Baeza-Yates, C. Hurtado, and M. Mendoza. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In International Workshop on Clustering Information over the Web (ClustWeb, in conjunction with EDBT), Creete, Greece, March, Springer, LNCS, 2004, 588--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Bry and H. Wagner. Collaborative Categorization on the Web: Approach, Prototype, and Experience Report. Forschungsbericht/research report, 2003, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Cho, S. Roy, and R. Adams. Page Quality: In Search of an Unbiased Web Ranking. In Proceedings of SIGMOD Conference 2005, 2005, 551--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Cui, J. R. Wen, J. Y. Nie, and W. Y. Ma. Probabilistic query expansion using query logs. In Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2002, 325--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Damianos , J. Griffith, and D. Cuomo. Onomi: Social Bookmarking on a Corporate Intranet. The MITRE Corporation. Technical paper, 2006, www.mitre.org/work/tech_papers/tech_papers_06/06_0352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Fetterly, M. Manasse, M. Najork, and J.Wiener: A large-scale study of the evolution of Web pages. In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, 669--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. A. Golder and B. A. Huberman. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems, In Journal of Information Science, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Gomes and M. J. Silva. Modeling information persistence on the Web. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Engineering, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2006, 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. W. I. Grosky, D. V. Sreenath, F. Fotouhi. Emergent Semantics and the Multimedia Semantic Web. SIGMOD Record 31(4), 2002, 54--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. H. Haveliwala. Topic-Sensitive PageRank: A Context-Sensitive Ranking Algorithm for Web Search. In IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2003, 784--796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. Journal of the ACM, 1999, 604--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Mandl. Implementation and evaluation of a quality-based search engine. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 2006 Conference, 2006, 73--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Marlow, M. Naaman, D. Boyd and M. Davis. HT06, Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, To Read. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 2006 Conference, Odense, Denmark, 2006, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Mathes. Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. Mertens, R. Farzan, P. Brusilovsky. Social navigation in Web lectures. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 2006 Conference, Odense, Denmark, 2006, 41--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, 24:5, 1988, 513--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. N. Strutz. Communal Categorization: The Folksonomy. INFO622: Content Representation, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. X. Wu, L. Zhang and Y. Yu. Exploring Social Annotations for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 15th World Wide Web Conference, 2006, 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Wu, M. Zubair and K. Maly. Harvesting Social Knowledge from Folksonomies. In Proceedings of ACM HyperText 2006 Conference, Odense, Denmark, 2006, 111--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. Zhang, X. Wu and Y. Yu. Emergent Semantics from Folksonomies: A Quantitative Study. Journal on Data Semantics VI, LNCS 4090, 2006, 168--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. S. Yu, X. Li, B. Liu. On the temporal dimension of search. In Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web Conference, 2004, 448-449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
        June 2007
        534 pages
        ISBN:9781595936448
        DOI:10.1145/1255175

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader