ABSTRACT
In this paper we survey the literature to identify the issues and challenges of broadening participation in computer science, and provide some suggestions to address these challenges. Our attention focuses on redefining the way we approach computing education so that we can successfully entice students to computing that have not traditionally participated, thereby promoting diversity and increasing the total numbers of computing professionals. Based on the literature review, we propose an interactional model from the social sciences to inform the way in which we might restructure and broaden the definition of computing and provide some examples of strategies that we have found to be successful in practice.
- Acker, J. (1992). Gendered institutions: From sex roles to gendered institutions.Contemporary Sociology, 21: 565--569.Google Scholar
- Ahuja, M., Robinson, J., Herring, S., and Ogan, C. (2004). Exploring antecedents of gender equitable outcomes in IT higher education. In Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Careers, Culture, and Ethics in A Networked Environment (pp. 120--123). New York, NY, ACM Press. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/982372.982401 Google ScholarDigital Library
- American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2000). TechsSavvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age. Washington, DC: AAUWGoogle Scholar
- Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clewell B. C., Ginorio, A.B., (1996) Examining Women's Progress in the Sciences from the Perspective of Diversity. In Cinda-Sue Davis, Angela B. Ginorio, et al, The Equity Equation, Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Cohoon, J. M. (1999). Departmental differences can point the way to improving female retention in computer science. In the Proceedings of the 30th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. pp. 198--2020. New Your, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cohoon, J. M. (2003). Must there be so few? Including women in computer science. In Proceedings from 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA., pgs 668--674. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Connell, R. (2002). Gender: Short Introductions. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Dalton, S. &. Fenstermaker, S. (2002). "Doing gender" differently: Institutional change in second-parent adoptions. Chapter 9 in Fenstermaker Sarah and West Candace (Editors). Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Davis, T., and S. Matzko (2006) Using Graphics Research to Teach Freshman Computer Science, In 33rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) Educators Program, Conference DVD, Boston, MA, July 30-August 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doerschuk, P. (2004). A research and mentoring program for undergraduate women in computer science, Department of Computer Science, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elkjaer, B. (1992). Girls and information technology in Denman -an account of a socially constructed problem, Gender & Education, 4: 25--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Encarnação, L. M., W. Müller,, L. Osterweis, P. Thornton (2000), Developing a Curriculum on the Arts and Mechanics of New Media for an International Post-graduate Audience. ACM SIGGRAPH: SIGGRAPH 2000. Educators Program. Conference Abstracts and Applications. New York: ACM Press, pp. 34--39.Google Scholar
- Entwistle, M. S. (2002). Augustana women in computer science (AWCS): a program to encourage women in the pursuit of technical education and careers. Journal of Comput. Small Colleges, 17(5):206--215. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (1998). New perspectives on gender differences in mathematics: A reprise. Educational Researcher, 27: 19--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Forte, A. & Gudial, M. (2005). Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: Identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses, IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2): 248--253. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Freeman P. A. and Cuny J., (2005) Common Ground, A Diverse CS Community Benefits All of Us, Computing Research News, Vol. 17, No. 1, http://www.cra.org/CRN/articles/jan05/freeman.cuny.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Fry, C. C. & Allgood, S. L. (2002). The effect of female student participation in the Society of Women Engineers on retention-a study at Baylor University, Dept. of Computer Science. Frontiers in Education, 2: 6--9.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, S. and Latulipe, C. (2003). Computer science girls rock: Sparking interest in computer science and debunking the stereotypes. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp.322--326). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/611892.611998 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanson, L. L. (1996) Lost Talent, Women in the Sciences, Temple University Press,Google Scholar
- Leggon, C. B. (2003) Women of Color in IT: Degree Trends and Policy Implications" IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Fall.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Moorman, P. and Johnson, E. (2003). Still a stranger here: Attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 193--197). New York, NY: ACM Press. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/961511.961564 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peckham, J., P. D. Stephenson, L. M. Encarnação, J -Y. Hervé, R. Hutt (2007). Increasing Student Retention in Computer Science through Research Programs for Undergraduates. In Proceedings of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science education (SIGCSE), Covington, Kentucky, USA, March 7-10, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raghuram, P. (2004). Migration, gender, and the IT sector: Interesting debates. Women's Studies International Forum. 27(2): pp. 163--176.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Randall, C., Price, B., and Reichgelt, H. (2003). Women in computing programs: Does the incredible shrinking pipeline apply to all computing programs? SIGCSE Bul,. 35(4):55--59. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/960492.960526 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rich, L., Perry, H., and Guzdial, M. (2004). A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 190--194). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/971300.971370 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ridgeway, C. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 637--655.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Risman, B. (1998). Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
- Risman, Barbara. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society 18(4): 429--450.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sadker, D. & Sadker, M. (1986). Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school. Phi Delta Kappan. 67: 358--361.Google Scholar
- Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69: 21--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steele, C. M. (1997). A Threat in the air: How Stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologies, 52, 613--629.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797--811.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephenson, P. D., L. M. Encarnação, J. Peckham, J -Y. Hervé, R. Hutt (2007). Using Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Research to Promote Computer Science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(3): 98--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas, R. E., (1997). Problem-based learning: Measurable outcomes. Medical Education, 31, 320--329.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Treu, K. and Skinner, A. (2002). Ten suggestions for a gender-equitable computer science classroom. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2): 165--167. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543812.543851 Google ScholarDigital Library
- West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125--151.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Broadening participation in computing: issues and challenges
Recommendations
Broadening participation in computing: issues and challenges
Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE'07)In this paper we survey the literature to identify the issues and challenges of broadening participation in computer science, and provide some suggestions to address these challenges. Our attention focuses on redefining the way we approach computing ...
Broadening participation in computing: the multi-tiered approach
ACM-SE '12: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Southeast Regional ConferenceBroadening Participation in Computing (BPC) is a national effort led by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to increase post-secondary enrollment of underrepresented groups in the computing disciplines. Under BPC funding from the NSF, a multi-tiered ...
INSPIRED broadening participation: first year experience and lessons learned
ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationThe Increasing Student Participation in Research Development Program ('INSPIRED') is designed to increase participation of women and underrepresented minorities in computing. It is a comprehensive program whose goals are to attract, retain and ...
Comments