skip to main content
10.1145/1278972.1278984acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesemnetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Robust node localization for wireless sensor networks

Published:25 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

The node localization problem in Wireless Sensor Networks has received considerable attention, driven by the need to obtain a higher location accuracy without incurring a large, per node, cost (dollar cost, power consumption and form factor). Despite the efforts made, no system has emerged as a robust, practical, solution for the node localization problem in realistic, complex, outdoor environments. In this paper, we argue that the existing localization algorithms, individually, work well for single sets of assumptions. These assumptions do not always hold, as in the case of outdoor, complex environments. To solve this problem, we propose a framework that allows the execution of multiple localization schemes. This "protocol multi-modality" enables robustness against any single protocol failure, due to its assumptions. We present the design of the framework, and show a 50% decrease in localization error in comparison with state of art node localization protocols. We also show that complex, more robust, localization systems can be build from localization schemes that have limitations.

References

  1. N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, October 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Doherty, K. Pister, and L. Ghaoui. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. Girod and D. Estrin. Robust range estimation using acoustic and multimodal sensing. In Proceedings of IEEE/IRJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. He, C. Huang, B. Blum, J. A. Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher. Range-Free localization schemes in large scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Lazos and R. Poovendran. SeRLoc: Secure range-independent localization for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Wireless Security (WiSe), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Maroti, B. Kusy, G. Balogh, P. Volgyesi, A. Nadas, K. Molnar, S. Dora, and A. Ledeczi. Radio interferometric geolocation. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Meling. Non-hierarchical dynamic protocol composition in Jgroup/ARM. In Proceedings of Norsk Informatikkonferanse, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Nagpal, H. Shrobe, and J. Bachrach. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Niculescu and B. Nath. DV-based positioning in adhoc networks. Telecommunication Systems, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. Parkinson and J. Spilker. Global positioning system: theory and applications. Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Priyantha, A. Chakraborty, and H. Balakrishnan. The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Regehr and J. A. Stankovic. HLS: A framework for composing soft real-time schedulers. In Proceedings of IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Savvides, C. Han, and M. Srivastava. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Shang, W. Ruml, Y. Zhang, and M. P. J. Fromherz. Localization from mere connectivity. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Stoleru, T. He, J. A. Stankovic, and D. Luebke. A high-accuracy low-cost localization system for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. van Renesse, K. P. Birman, R. Friedman, M. Hayden, and D. A. Karr. A framework for protocol composition in Horus. In Principles of Distributed Computing, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Robust node localization for wireless sensor networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            EmNets '07: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Embedded networked sensors
            June 2007
            100 pages
            ISBN:9781595936943
            DOI:10.1145/1278972

            Copyright © 2007 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 June 2007

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader