skip to main content
10.1145/1278972.1278987acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesemnetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An HMM framework for optimal sensor selection with applications to BSN sensor glove design

Published:25 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic surgical training is a challenging task due to the complexity of instrument control and demand on manual dexterity and hand-eye coordination. Currently, training and assessing surgeons for their laparoscopic skills rely mainly on subjective assessment. This paper presents a Body Sensor Network (BSN) sensor glove for laparoscopic gesture recognition and objective assessment of surgical skills. An HMM framework is proposed for the selection of sensors to maximize the sensitivity and specificity of gesture recognition for a given set of laparoscopic tasks. With the proposed framework, the optimal location as well as the number of the sensors can be determined. The sensors used in this study include accelerometers and fiber optic bend sensors. Experimental data is collected by participants wearing the glove while performing simple laparoscopic tasks. By using the proposed HMM framework, sensor correlation and relevance to task recognition can be determined, thus allowing a reduction in the number of sensors used. Results have shown that it is possible to establish the intrinsic correlation of the sensors and determine which sensors are most relevant to specific gestures based on the proposed method.

References

  1. Vereczkel, A., Bubb, H., and Feussner, H. Laparoscopic surgery and ergonomics: It's time to think of ourselves as well. Surgical Endoscopy, 2003. 17(10):1680--1682.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Darzi, A., Smith, S., and Taffinder, N. Assessing Operative Skill. BMJ, 1999. 318: 887--888.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gallagher, A. G., Richie, K., McClure, N., McGuigan, J. Objective Psychomotor Skills Assessment of Experienced, Junior, and Novice Laparoscopists with Virtual Reality. World Journal of Surgery, 2001. 25(11): 1478--1483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rosen, J., Hannaford, B., Richards, C. G., Sinanan, M. N. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2001. 48(5): 579--591.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berguer, R., Forkey, D. L., and Smith, W. D. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 1999. 13(5): 466--468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Quick, N. E., Gillette, J. C., Shapiro, R., Adrales, G. L., Gerlach, D., Park, A. E. The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures. Surgical Endoscopy, 2003. 17(3): 462--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Matern, U., Kuttler, G., Giebmeyer, C., Waller, P., Faist, M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: An electromyographic-based study. Surgical Endoscopy, 2004. 18(8): 1231--1241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lal, T. N., Schröder, M., Hinterberger, T., Weston, J., Bogdan, M., Birbaumer, N., Schölkopf, B. Support Vector Channel Selection on BCI. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2004, 51(6): 1003--1010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Worden, K., and Burrows, A. P. Optimal sensor placement for fault detection. Engineering Structures 23 (2001), 885--901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yang, G.-Z., Body Sensor Networks, ed. G.-Z. Yang. 2006, London: Springer-VerlagGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rabiner, L. R, (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1989. 77(2): 257--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bicego, M., Murino, V., and Figueiredo, M. A. T. Similarity-based classification of sequences using hidden Markov models. Pattern Recognition, 2004. 37(12): 2281--2291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Heinrichs, W. L., Srivastava, S., Montgomery, K., Dev, P. The fundamental manipulations of surgery: a structured vocabulary for designing surgical curricula and simulators. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 2004: 450--456Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    EmNets '07: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Embedded networked sensors
    June 2007
    100 pages
    ISBN:9781595936943
    DOI:10.1145/1278972

    Copyright © 2007 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 June 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader