skip to main content
10.1145/1288580.1288591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

First year students' impressions of pair programming in CS1

Published:15 September 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Pair programming, as part of the Agile Development process, has noted benefits in professional software development scenarios. These successes have led to a rise in use of pair programming in educational settings, particularly in CS1. Specifically [6] has shown that students using pair programming in CS1 do better in a CS2 class (with solo programming) than students who don't pair in CS1. This paper seeks to address a similar question, but from a qualitative, student-focused approach. How do students define, experience and value the pair programming experience? How do they experience and value it compared to solo programming? Does pairing in CS1 impact their confidence in their abilities.

We report on semi-structured interviews with eleven subjects from two institutions where pair programming was used in CS1 and solo programming was used in the next course. Many of the responses met our expectations: students get stuck less and explore more ideas while pairing, and believe that pair programming helped them in CS1. Other responses were more surprising. Students reported that when solo programming that they were more confident and understood their programs better. Many students also said that they started work on their assignments earlier when soloing. Students also continue to use other students as resources even when working "solo".

References

  1. B. Hanks. Empirical Studies of Distributed Pair Programming. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Hanks, C. McDowell, D. Draper, and M. Krnjajic. Program quality with pair programming in CS1. Proceedings ITiCSE 2004, pages 176--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Katira, L. Williams, E. Wiebe, C. Miller, S. Balik, and E. Gehringer. On understanding compatibility of student pair programmers. Proceedings SIGCSE 2004, pages 7--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Margolis and A. Fisher. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. Bullock, and J. Fernald. The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2003), pages 602--607, May 3-10, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. E. Bullock, and J. Fernald. Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Commun. ACM, 49(8):90--95, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Melnik and F. Maurer. Perceptions of agile practices: A student survey. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, number 2418 in LNCS, pages 241--250. Springer, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Thomas, M. Ratcliffe, and A. Robertson. Code warriors and code-a-phobes: A study in attitude and pair programming. Proceedings SIGCSE 2003, pages 363--367. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. VanDeGrift. Coupling pair programming and writing: Learning about students' perceptions and processes. Proceedings SIGCSE 2004, pages 2--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Werner, B. Hanks, and C. McDowell. Pair programming helps female computer science students persist. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 4(1), Mar. 2004. Published April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. First year students' impressions of pair programming in CS1

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICER '07: Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research
        September 2007
        172 pages
        ISBN:9781595938411
        DOI:10.1145/1288580

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 September 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        ICER '07 Paper Acceptance Rate14of24submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICER 2024
        ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
        August 13 - 15, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader