skip to main content
10.1145/1294211.1294217acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The re:search engine: simultaneous support for finding and re-finding

Published:07 October 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Re-finding, a common Web task, is difficult when previously viewed information is modified, moved, or removed. For example, if a person finds a good result using the query "breast cancer treatments", she expects to be able to use the same query to locate the same result again. While re-finding could be supported by caching the original list, caching precludes the discovery of new information, such as, in this case, new treatment options. People often use search engines to simultaneously find and re-find information. The Re:Search Engine is designed to support both behaviors in dynamic environments like the Web by preserving only the memorable aspects of a result list. A study of result list memory shows that people forget a lot. The Re:Search Engine takes advantage of these memory lapses to include new results where old results have been forgotten.

References

  1. Ahlström, D. (2005). Modeling and improving selection in cascading pull-down menus using Fitts' law, the steering law and force fields. In Proceedings of CHI '05, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aula, A., Jhaveri, N., and Käki, M. (2005). Information search and reaccess strategies of experienced Web users. In Proceedings of WWW '05, 583--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bruce, H., Jones, W. and Dumais, S. (2004). Keeping and refinding information on the Web: What do people do and what do they need?allIn Proceedings of ASIST '04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Capra, R. and Pérez-Quiñones, M.A. (2005). Using Web search engines to find and refind information. IEEE Computer, 38 (10), 36--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dumais, S. T., Cutrell, E., Cadiz, J. J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R. and Robbins, D. C. (2003). Stuff I've Seen: A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. In Proceedings of SIGIR '03, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Durlach, P. J. (2004). Change blindness and its implications for complex monitoring and control systems design and operator training. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4): 423--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Goldberg, A.V. (1997). An efficient implementation of a scaling minimum-cost flow algorithm. Journal of Algorithms, 22(1): 1--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hayashi, K., Nomura, T., Hazama, T., Takeoka, M., Hashimoto, S., and Gudmundson, S. (1998). Temporally-threaded workspace: A model for providing activity-based perspectives on document spaces. In Proceeding of HyperText '98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Komlodi, A., Soergel, D., and Marhionini, G. (2006). Search histories for user support in user interfaces. JASIST, 57(6): 803--807. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Levy, D. (1994). Fixed or fluid? Document stability and new media. In Proceedings of European Conference on Hypertext. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mitchell, J. and Shneiderman, B. (1989). Dynamic versus static menus: An exploratory comparison. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 20(4): 33--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Murdock, B. B. (1962). The Serial Position Effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nowell, L., Hetzler, E., and Tanasse, T. (2001). Change blindness in information visualization: A case study. In Proceedings of INFOVIS '01, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Obendorf, H., Weinreich, H., Herder, E., and Mayer, M. (2007). Web page revisitation revisited: Implications of a long-term click-stream study of browser usage. In Proceedings of CHI '07, 597--606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rainie, L. and Shermak, J. (2005). Pew Internet and American Life Project:allData memo on search engine use. Retrieved January, 2006 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SearchData_1105.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rekimoto, J. (1999). Time-machine computing: A time-centric approach for the information environment. In Proceedings of UIST '99, 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rubin, R. C. and Wenzel, A. E. (1996). 100 years of forgetting: A quantitative description of Retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734--760.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Salton, G. (1998). Automatic text indexing using complex identifiers. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Document processing systems, 135--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Selberg, E. and Etzioni, O. (2000). On the instability of Web search engines. In Proceedings of RIAO '00.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Silverstein, C., Marais, H., Henzinger, M., and Moricz, M. (1999). Analysis of a very large Web search engine query log. ACM SIGIR Forum, 33(1): 6--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Simons, D. J. and Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1):16--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Somberg, B. L. (1986). A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items. In Proceedings of CHI/GI '86, 255--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Teevan, J. (2006). How people recall search result lists. In Proceedings of CHI '06, 1415--1420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Teevan, J. (2007). Supporting finding and refinding through personalization. Doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Teevan, J., Adar, E., Jones, R., and Potts, M. (2007). Information Re-Retrieval: Repeat queries in Yahoo's logs. In Proceedings of SIGIR '07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., Ackerman, M. S., and Karger, D. R. (2004). The perfect search engine is not enough: A study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In Proceedings of CHI '04, 415--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tognazzini (1999). A quiz designed to give you Fitts. http://asktog.com/columns/022DesignedToGiveFitts.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Varakin, D. A., Levin, D. T., and Fidler, R. (2004). Unseen and unaware: Implications of recent research on failures of visual awareness for human-computer interface design. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4): 389--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. White, R., Ruthven, I., and Jose, J.M. (2002). Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: An evaluation of two alternative schemes. In Proceedings of SIGIR '02, 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The re:search engine: simultaneous support for finding and re-finding

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UIST '07: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
          October 2007
          306 pages
          ISBN:9781595936790
          DOI:10.1145/1294211

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 October 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          UIST '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader