skip to main content
10.1145/1329125.1329461acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A multi-agent system of evidential reasoning for intelligence analyses

Published:14 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a Multi-Agent System intended for assisting military commanders and intelligence analysts in the discovery and analysis of publicly available information that may have intelligence value (Open Source Intelligence, or OSINT). Our system is called Webster, which is a pun on the well-known dictionary and the World Wide Web. An innovative feature of Webster is the trust network that allows for the hierarchical integration of judgements provided by both human and computer agents, and the ability to extend the system by adding new agents that encapsulate a given characterization capability - such as the ability to provide a level of facial recognition on images that may be embedded in web pages. A key challenge is in creating a normalized concept structure or belief frame that all participating agents, at a certain level, can use to focus their analysis and render opinions that can be meaningfully combined with the opinions of other entities in the system. Webster can scale from a single machine to a large interconnection of subject matter experts and special-purpose computer systems by providing proxy agents that act as intermediaries in the system.

References

  1. T. Arai, K. Sycara, and T. Payne, "Experience-based reinforcement learning to acquire effective behavior in a multi-agent domain," Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 125--135, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. A. Barnett, "Calculating Dempster-Shafer Plausibility," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol.13, No.6, 599--602, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Jøsang, "A Logic for Uncertain Probabilities," International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 9, pp. 279--212, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Jøsang, "Subjective Evidential Reasoning," Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (IPMU2002), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Lefevre, O. Colot, and P. Vannoorenberghe, "Belief function combination and conflict management," Information Fusion, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 149--162, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Pope, A. Jøsang, and D. McAnally. "Formal Methods of Countering Deception and Misperception in Intelligence Analysis". In the proceedings of the 11th ICCRTS Coalition Command and Control in the Networked Era, Cambridge, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Sentz, S. Ferson, "Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory," Sandia Report SAND2002-0835, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence: Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. "WordNet - Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory." http://wordnet.princeton.edu/ (accessed February 7, 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A multi-agent system of evidential reasoning for intelligence analyses

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Other conferences
                  AAMAS '07: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
                  May 2007
                  1585 pages
                  ISBN:9788190426275
                  DOI:10.1145/1329125

                  Copyright © 2007 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 14 May 2007

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader