skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We are in the midst of an explosion of emerging human-computer interaction techniques that redefine our understanding of both computers and interaction. We propose the notion of Reality-Based Interaction (RBI) as a unifying concept that ties together a large subset of these emerging interaction styles. Based on this concept of RBI, we provide a framework that can be used to understand, compare, and relate current paths of recent HCI research as well as to analyze specific interaction designs. We believe that viewing interaction through the lens of RBI provides insights for design and uncovers gaps or opportunities for future research.

References

  1. Abowd, G.D. and Dix, A.J., Integrating Status and Event Phenomena in Formal Specifications of Interactive Systems. in Proc. SIGSOFT 1994, (1994), Addison-Wesley/ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agarawala, A. and Balakrishnan, R. Keepin' it real: pushing the desktop metaphor with physics, piles and the pen Proc. CHI2006, ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ängeslevä, J., Oakley, I., Hughes, S. and O'Modhrain, S., Body Mnemonics Portable device interaction design concept. in UIST, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Apted, T., Kay, J. and Quigley, A. Tabletop sharing of digital photographs for the elderly Proc. of SIGCHI, ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bae, S.-H., Kobayash, T., Kijima, R. and Kim, W.-S., Tangible NURBS-curve manipulation techniques using graspable handles on a large display. in Proc. UIST 2004, (2004), ACM Press, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces Proc. CHI 2000, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press, 2000, 446--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Beeharee, A. and Steed, A. Exploiting real world knowledge in ubiquitous applications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11. 429--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E., Henderson, A. and Lopes, C. Making Sense of Sensing Systems: Five Questions for Designers and Researchers Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press, 2002, 415--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Benford, S., Schnadelbach, H., Koleva, B., Anastasi, R., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., Green, J., Ghali, A., Pridmore, T., Gaver, B., Boucher, A., Walker, B., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Gellersen, H. and Steed, A. Expected, sensed, and desired: A framework for designing sensing--based interaction. ACM Transactions Computer-Human Interaction, 12 (1). 3--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J. and Poupyrev, I. 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison-Wesley/Pearson Education, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Buur, J., Jensen, M.V. and Djajadiningrat, T., Please touch tangible UIs: Hands-only scenarios and video action walls: novel methods for tangible user interaction design. in Proc. DIS'04, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Buxton, B. http://www.billbuxton.com/multitouchOverview.html, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Christou, G. Towards a new method for the evaluation of reality based interaction CHI '07 extended abstracts, ACM, San Jose, CA, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Coutrix, C. and Nigay, L. Mixed reality: a model of mixed interaction. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dickie, C., Vertegaal, R., Sohn, C. and Cheng, D. eyeLook: using attention to facilitate mobile media consumption Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dourish, P. Where The Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dubois, E. and Gray, P. A Design-Oriented Information-Flow Refinement of the ASUR Interaction Model. Proceedings of EHCI 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fishkin, K.P. A Taxonomy for and Analysis of Tangible Interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8 (5). 347 -- 358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Fishkin, K.P., Moran, T.P. and Harrison, B.L. Embodied User Interfaces: Toward Invisible User Interfaces Proc. of EHCI'98, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Forlines, C. and Shen, C., Touch: DTLens: multi-user tabletop spatial data exploration. in Proc. UIST 2005, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hayes, P.J. The second naive physics manifesto Cognitive Science Technical Report URCS-10, University of Rochester, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hornecker, E. and Buur, J., Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. in Proc. of CHI 2006, (2006), ACM, 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hurtienne, J. and Israel, J.H. Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction Proc. TEI 2007, ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D. and Norman, D.A. Direct Manipulation Interfaces. Draper, D.A.N.a.S.W. ed. User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1986, 87--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, R.L. and Fagan, E., Collaboration and learning within immersive virtual reality. in Proc. Collaborative Virtual Environments, (2000), ACM Press, 83 -- 92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jacob, R.J.K., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L.M., Horn, M.S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E.T. and Zigelbaum, J., Reality-Based Interaction: Unifying the New Generation of Interaction Styles (Work in Progress paper). in CHI 2007, (2007), 2465--2470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jacob, R.J.K., Girouard, A., Horn, M., Miller, L., Shaer, O., Treacy, E. and Zigelbaum, J. What Is the Next Generation of Human--Computer Interaction? interactions, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kalanithi, J. Connectibles: Tangible Social Networking, MS Thesis, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, 2007, 132pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Klemmer, S.R., Hartmann, B. and Takayama, L., How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. in Proc. DIS 2006, (2006), ACM Press, 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. MacLean, A., Young, R.M., Bellotti, V.M.E. and Moran, T.P. Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6. 201--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maeda, J. The Laws of Simplicity (Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life). The MIT Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Merrill, D. and Maes, P., Augmenting Looking, Pointing and Reaching Gestures to Enhance the Searching and Browsing of Physical Objects. in Proc. Pervasive'07, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Milgram, P. and Kishino, F., Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. in SPIE, (1994), 282--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohler, B.J., Thompson, W.B., Creem-Regehr, S.H., Willemsen, P., Herbert L. Pick, Jr. and Rieser, J.J. Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 4 (1). 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Nielsen, J. Noncommand User Interfaces Comm. ACM, 1993, 83--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Poupyrev, I., Newton--Dunn, H. and Bau, O. D20: interaction with multifaceted display devices CHI '06 extended abstracts, ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Rohrer, T. Metaphors We Compute By: Bringing Magic into Interface Design, Center for the Cognitive Science of Metaphor, Philosophy Department, University of Oregon, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Second Life. http://secondlife.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shneiderman, B. Direct Manipulation. A Step Beyond Programming Languages. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 16 (8). 57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Shneiderman, B. Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Shneiderman, B. Why Not Make Interfaces Better Than 3D Reality? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2003, 12--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Slater, M., Usoh, M. and Steed, A. Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 2 (3). 201--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Smith, J.D., Vertegaal, R. and Sohn, C., ViewPointer: lightweight calibration-free eye tracking for ubiquitous handsfree deixis. in Proc. UIST 2005, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Streitz, N.A., Tandler, P., Muller-Tomfelde, C. and Konomi, S. Roomware: Toward the Next Generation of Human-Computer Interaction Based on an Integrated Design of Real and Virtual Worlds. Carroll, J.M. ed. Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millenium, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press, Reading, Mass., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Tanriverdi, V. A Virtual Reality Interface Design (VRID) Model and Methodology, Tufts University, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanriverdi, V. and Jacob, R.J.K., Interacting with Eye Movements in Virtual Environments. in Proc. CHI 2000, (2000), Addison-Wesley/ACM Press, 265--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ullmer, B. and Ishii, H. Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces. Carroll, J.M. ed. Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millenium, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press, Reading, Mass., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullmer, B., Ishii, H. and Jacob, R.J.K. Token+Constraint Systems for Tangible Interaction with Digital Information ACM TOCHI, 2005, 81--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Underkoffler, J. and Ishii, H. Urp: A Luminous-Tangible Workbench for Urban Planning and Design Proc. CHI'99, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press, 1999, 386--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Usoh, M., Arthur, K., Whitton, M.C., Bastos, R., Steed, A., Slater, M. and Brooks, F.P. Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments Proc. SIGGRAPH'99, Addison-Wesley/ACM Press, 1999, 359--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Van Dam, A. Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun. ACM, 40 (2). 63--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Vinson, N.G. Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments Proc CHI, ACM Press, 1999, 278--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Vogel, D. and Balakrishnan, R., Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays. in Proc. UIST 2005, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Warren, J. A Wii Workout: When Videogames Hurt Wall Street Journal Online, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Weiser, M. The Computer for the Twenty-first Century Scientific American, 1991, 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Zigelbaum, J., Horn, M., Shaer, O. and Jacob, R., The tangible video editor: collaborative video editing with active tokens. in Proc. TEI '07, (2007), ACM, 43--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2008
      1870 pages
      ISBN:9781605580111
      DOI:10.1145/1357054

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 April 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader