skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357212acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Harvesting with SONAR: the value of aggregating social network information

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web 2.0 gives people a substantial role in content and metadata creation. New interpersonal connections are formed and existing connections become evident through Web 2.0 services. This newly created social network (SN) spans across multiple services and aggregating it could bring great value. In this work we present SONAR, an API for gathering and sharing SN information. We give a detailed description of SONAR, demonstrate its potential value through user scenarios, and show results from experiments we conducted with a SONAR-based social networking application. These suggest that aggregating SN information across diverse data sources enriches the SN picture and makes it more complete and useful for the end user.

References

  1. Adamic, L. A., and Adar, E. Friends and neighbors on the Web, Social Networks, 25, 3 (2003), 211--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aleman-Meza, B., Nagarajan, M., Ramakrishnan, C., Sheth, A., Arpinar, I., Ding, L., Kolari, P., Josi, A., and Finin, T. Semantic analytics on social networks: Experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. Proc. WWW '06, ACM Press (2006), 407--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bar-Yossef, Z., Guy, I., Lempel, R., Maarek, Y. S., and Soroka, V. Cluster ranking with an application to mining mailbox networks. Proc. ICDM '06, IEEE Computer Society (2006), 63--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cai, D., Shao, Z., He, X., Yan, X., and Han, J. Mining hidden community in heterogeneous social networks. In Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery (LinkKDD 2005),ACM Press (2005), 58 -- 65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Culotta, A., Bekkerman, R., and McCallum, A. Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the Web. First Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS 2004) (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Facebook Developers - Documentation. http://developers.facebook.com/documentation.php .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrell, S., and Lau, T. Fringe Contacts: People-Tagging for the Enterprise. Workshop on Collaborative Web Tagging, WWW'06, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Farnham, S., Portnoy, W., Turski, A., Cheng, L., and Vronay, D. Personal Map: Automatically modeling the user's online social network. Proc. INTERACT'03, IOS Press (2003), 567--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fielding, R.T. Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine, CA, (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Friend of a Friend (FOAF) project. http://www.foaf-project.org/ .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. HammerSley, B. Content Syndication with RSS, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hope, T., Nishimura, T., and Takeda, H. An integrated method for social network extraction. Proc. WWW '06, ACM Press (2006), 845--846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Introducing JSON. http://www.json.org/ .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson, A., Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. "Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk". Proc. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS'07, (2007), p. 80 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kautz, H., Selman, B., and Shah., M. ReferralWeb: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Communications of the ACM 40, 3 (1997), 63--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matsuo, Y., Hamasaki, M. et al. Spinning multiple social networks for semantic Web. Proc. AAAI '06 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Matsuo, Y., Mori, J., Hamasaki, M., Takeda, H., Nishimura, T., Hasida, K., and Ishizuka, M. POLYPHONET: An advanced social network extraction system. Proc. WWW '06, ACM Press (2006), 397--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McDonald D.W. and Ackerman M.S. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. Proc. CSCW'00, (2000), 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J., and Kerr, B. Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise. Proc. CHI 2006, (2006), 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S., Issacs, E., Creech, M., Johnson, J., and Hainsworth, J. Integrating communication and information through contact map. Communications of the ACM 45, 4 (2002) 89--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A., Smith, M., and Fisher, D. The social network and relationship finder: Social sorting for email triage. Proc. CEAS 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Newman, M. E. J. Scientific collaboration networks, part I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131, (2001).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nottingham, M., and Sayre, R. RFC 4287 - The Atom Syndication Format (Proposed Standard). http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. O'Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0. http://www.oreillynet.com/go/web2 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Resig, J., Dawara, S., Homan, C. M., and Teredesai, A. Extracting social networks from instant messaging populations, Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Link KDD, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Smarr, J. Technical and privacy challenges for integrating FOAF into existing applications. In the 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and the Semantic Web, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, M. Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Measuring and mapping the social structure of Usenet. In Smith, M., and Kollock, P. Eds., Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge Press, (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tyler, J.R., Wilkinson, D.M., and Huberman, B.A. Email as spectroscopy: Automated discovery of community structure within organizations. In Communities and Technologies, Huysman, M., Wenger, E., and V. Wulf, Eds. (2003), 81--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis. (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, J., Ackerman M.S. Searching for expertise in social networks: a simulation of potential strategies. Proc. GROUP 2005, ACM Press (2005), 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wellman, B. Computer networks as social networks. Science 293 (2001) 2031--2034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Harvesting with SONAR: the value of aggregating social network information

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2008
        1870 pages
        ISBN:9781605580111
        DOI:10.1145/1357054

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 April 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader