skip to main content
10.1145/1376616.1376621acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Capacity constrained assignment in spatial databases

Published:09 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Given a point set P of customers (e.g., WiFi receivers) and a point set Q of service providers (e.g., wireless access points), where each qQ has a capacity q.k, the capacity constrained assignment (CCA) is a matching MQ × P such that (i) each point qQ (pP) appears at most k times (at most once) in M, (ii) the size of M is maximized (i.e., it comprises min{|P|, ∑qQq.k} pairs), and (iii) the total assignment cost (i.e., the sum of Euclidean distances within all pairs) is minimized. Thus, the CCA problem is to identify the assignment with the optimal overall quality; intuitively, the quality of q's service to p in a given (q, p) pair is anti-proportional to their distance. Although max-flow algorithms are applicable to this problem, they require the complete distance-based bipartite graph between Q and P. For large spatial datasets, this graph is expensive to compute and it may be too large to fit in main memory. Motivated by this fact, we propose efficient algorithms for optimal assignment that employ novel edge-pruning strategies, based on the spatial properties of the problem. Additionally, we develop approximate (i.e., suboptimal) CCA solutions that provide a trade-off between result accuracy and computation cost, abiding by theoretical quality guarantees. A thorough experimental evaluation demonstrates the efficiency and practicality of the proposed techniques.

References

  1. R. K. Ahuja, T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, first edition, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Beckmann, H.-P. Kriegel, R. Schneider, and B. Seeger. The R*-tree: An Efficient and Robust Access Method for Points and Rectangles. In SIGMOD, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Brinkhoff. A Framework for Generating Network-Based Moving Objects. GeoInformatica, 6(2):153--180, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Corral, Y. Manolopoulos, Y. Theodoridis, and M. Vassilakopoulos. Closest Pair Queries in Spatial Databases. In SIGMOD, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. V. Goldberg and R. Kennedy. An Efficient Cost Scaling Algorithm for the Assignment Problem. Mathematical Programming, 71:153--177, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Guttman. R-Trees: A Dynamic Index Structure for Spatial Searching. In SIGMOD, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. R. Hjaltason and H. Samet. Distance Browsing in Spatial Databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 24(2):265--318, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Munkres. Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems. Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 5(1):32--38, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. T. K. Sellis, N. Roussopoulos, and C. Faloutsos. The R+-Tree: A Dynamic Index for Multi-Dimensional Objects. In VLDB, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Silberschatz, H. F. Korth, and S. Sudarshan. Database System Concepts. McGraw-Hill, fifth edition, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. I. H. Toroslu and G. Üçoluk. Incremental Assignment Problem. Inf. Sci., 177:1523--1529, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. H. U, N. Mamoulis, and M. L. Yiu. Continuous Monitoring of Exclusive Closest Pairs. In SSTD, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Vygen. Approximation Algorithms for Facility Location Problems (Lecture Notes). University of Bonn, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. C.-W. Wong, Y. Tao, A. Fu, and X. Xiao. On Efficient Spatial Matching. In VLDB, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. L. Yiu and N. Mamoulis. Clustering objects on a spatial network. In SIGMOD, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Capacity constrained assignment in spatial databases

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMOD '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
        June 2008
        1396 pages
        ISBN:9781605581026
        DOI:10.1145/1376616

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 June 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader