skip to main content
10.1145/1378773.1378827acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

TrueKeys: identifying and correcting typing errors for people with motor impairments

Published:13 January 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

People with motor impairments often have difficulty typing using desktop keyboards. We developed TrueKeys, a system that combines models of word frequency, keyboard layout, and typing error patterns to automatically identify and correct typing mistakes. In this paper, we describe the TrueKeys algorithm, compare its performance to existing correction algorithms, and report on a study of TrueKeys with 9 motor-impaired and 9 non-impaired participants. Running in non-interactive mode, TrueKeys performed more corrections than popular commercial and open source spell checkers. Used interactively, both motor-impaired and non-impaired users performed typing tasks significantly more accurately with TrueKeys than without. However, typing speed was reduced while TrueKeys was enabled.

References

  1. Boissiere, P. and Dours, D. (1996). VITIPI: Versatile interpretation of text input by persons with impairments. In Proc. ICCHP '05, R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 165--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Damerau, F. J. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM, 7 (3), 171--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Deorowicz, S. and Ciura, M. G. (2005). Correcting spelling errors by modelling their causes. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 15 (2), 275--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Koester, H. H. and Levine, S. P. (1996). Effect of a word prediction feature on user performance. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 12 (3), 155--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, 707--710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. MacKenzie, I. S. and Soukoreff, R. W. (2003). Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM Press, 754--755. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. McCormack, D. (1990). The effects of keyguard use and pelvic positioning on typing speed and accuracy in a boy with cerebral palsy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44 (4), 312--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Soukoreff, R. W. and MacKenzie, I. S. (2001). Measuring errors in text entry tasks: an application of the Levenshtein string distance statistic. In Proc. CHI '01, ACM Press, 319--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Soukoreff, R. W. and MacKenzie, I. S. (2003). Metrics for text entry research: an evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM Press, 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Trewin, S. (2002). An invisible keyguard. In Proc. Assets '02, ACM Press, 143--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. (2006). Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13 (4), 458--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TrueKeys: identifying and correcting typing errors for people with motor impairments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '08: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      January 2008
      458 pages
      ISBN:9781595939876
      DOI:10.1145/1378773

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 January 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader