skip to main content
10.1145/1385569.1385594acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TapTap and MagStick: improving one-handed target acquisition on small touch-screens

Published:28 May 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the design and evaluation of TapTap and MagStick, two thumb interaction techniques for target acquisition on mobile devices with small touch-screens. These two techniques address all the issues raised by the selection of targets with the thumb on small tactile screens: screen accessibility, visual occlusion and accuracy. A controlled experiment shows that TapTap and MagStick allow the selection of targets in all areas of the screen in a fast and accurate way. They were found to be faster than four previous techniques except Direct Touch which, although faster, is too error prone. They also provided the best error rate of all tested techniques. Finally the paper also provides a comprehensive study of various techniques for thumb based touch-screen target selection.

References

  1. Albinsson, P. and Zhai, S. 2003. High precision touch screen interaction. Proc. CHI'03. 105--112. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blanch, R., Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. Proc. CHI'04. 519--526. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Guiard, Y., Blanch, R., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Object pointing: a complement to bitmap pointing in GUIs. Proc. Graphics interface 2004. Vol. 62. 9--16. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004). Target Acquisition in Multi-Scale Electronic Worlds. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 875--905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Huot, S., Lecolinet, E. Focus+Context Visualization Techniques for Displaying Large Lists with Multiple Points of Interest on Small Tactile Screens. Proc. Interact'07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Karlson, A., Bederson, B. ThumbSpace: Generalized One-Handed Input for Touchscreen-Based Mobile Devices. Proc. Interact'07. 324--338. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Karlson, A., Bederson, B., Contreras-Vidal, J. Understanding on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, Idea Group, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mankoff, J., Hudson, S. E., and Abowd, G. Interaction techniques for ambiguity resolution in recognition-based interfaces. Proc. UIST'00. 11--20. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Parhi, P., Karlson, A., Bederson, B. Target Size Study for One-Handed Thumb Use on Small Touchscreen Devices. Proc. MobileHCI'06. 203--210. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pascoe, J., Ryan, N., Morse, D. Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7(3):417--437. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Potter, R., Weldon, L., Shneiderman, B. Improving the Accuracy of Touchscreens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. Proc. CHI'88. 27--32. 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ren, X. and Moriya, S. Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: a study of pen-based interaction for selection tasks. ACM TOCHI. 7(3).384--416. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sears, A., Shneiderman, B. High precision touchscreens: design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 34(4):593--613. 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. 2007. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. Proc. CHI'07. 657--666. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grossman, T., Balakrishnan, R. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area. Proc. CHI'05. 281--290. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TapTap and MagStick: improving one-handed target acquisition on small touch-screens

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AVI '08: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
          May 2008
          483 pages
          ISBN:9781605581415
          DOI:10.1145/1385569

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 May 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader