skip to main content
10.1145/1390334.1390392acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations.

Published:20 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Search engine click logs provide an invaluable source of relevance information but this information is biased because we ignore which documents from the result list the users have actually seen before and after they clicked. Otherwise, we could estimate document relevance by simple counting. In this paper, we propose a set of assumptions on user browsing behavior that allows the estimation of the probability that a document is seen, thereby providing an unbiased estimate of document relevance. To train, test and compare our model to the best alternatives described in the Literature, we gather a large set of real data and proceed to an extensive cross-validation experiment. Our solution outperforms very significantly all previous models. As a side effect, we gain insight into the browsing behavior of users and we can compare it to the conclusions of an eye-tracking experiments by Joachims et al. [12]. In particular, our findings confirm that a user almost always see the document directly after a clicked document. They also explain why documents situated just after a very relevant document are clicked more often.

References

  1. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2006, pages 19--26, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S. Dumais, and R. Ragno. Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2006, pages 3--10, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Becker, C. Meek, and D. M. Chickering. Modeling contextual factors of click rates. In AAAI, pages 1310--1315, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Broder. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2):3--10, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Craswell, O. Zoeter, M. Taylor, and B. Ramsey. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In First ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining WSDM 2008, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Downey, S. T. Dumais, and E. Horvitz. Models of searching and browsing: Languages, studies, and application. In IJCAI, pages 2740--2747, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Dupret, B. Piwowarski, C. Hurtado, and M. Mendoza. A statistical model of query log generation. In Proceedings of SPIRE 2006, LNCS 4209, pages 217--228. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Genkin, D. Lewis, and D. Madigan. Large-scale Bayesian logistic regression for text categorization. Technometrics, 49, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2004, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In KDD '02: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD, pages 133--142, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2005, pages 154--161, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, F. Radlinski, and G. Gay. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. W. White and S. M. Drucker. Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In WWW '07, pages 21--30, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '08: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      July 2008
      934 pages
      ISBN:9781605581644
      DOI:10.1145/1390334

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 July 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader