skip to main content
10.1145/1397735.1397738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of social voting patterns on digg

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The social Web is transforming the way information is created and distributed. Blog authoring tools enable users to publish content, while sites such as Digg and Del.icio.us are used to distribute content to a wider audience. With content fast becoming a commodity, interest in using social networks to promote and find content has grown, both on the side of content producers (viral marketing) and consumers (recommendation). Here we study the role of social networks in promoting content on Digg, a social news aggregator that allows users to submit links to and vote on news stories. Digg's goal is to feature the most interesting stories on its front page, and it aggregates opinions of its many users to identify them. Like other social networking sites, Digg allows users to designate other users as "friends" and see what stories they found interesting. We studied the spread of interest in news stories submitted to Digg in June 2006. Our results suggest that pattern of the spread of interest in a story on the network is indicative of how popular the story will become. Stories that spread mainly outside of the submitter's neighborhood go on to be very popular, while stories that spread mainly through submitter's social neighborhood prove not to be very popular. This effect is visible already in the early stages of voting, and one can make a prediction about the potential audience of a story simply by analyzing where the initial votes come from.

References

  1. M. Arrington. Troubles in diggville. 09/06/2006 http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/06/troubles-in-diggville/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Calore. Digg fights top users for control, 09/07/2006 Wired News.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Crane and D. Sornette. Viral, quality, and junk videos on youtube: Separating content from noise in an information-rich environment. In Proc. of AAAI symposium on Social Information Processing, Menlo Park, CA, 2008. AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD '01: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 57--66, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Galstyan and P. Cohen. Cascading dynamics in modular networks. Phys. Rev. E, 75:036109, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Girvan and M. E. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99(12):7821--7826, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. S. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360--1380, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Gruhl, D. Liben-Nowell, R. Guha, and A. Tomkins. Information diffusion through blogspace. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 6(2):43--52, December 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Lerman. Social information processing in social news aggregation. IEEE Internet Computing: special issue on Social Search, 11(6):16--28, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Lerman. User participation in social media: Digg study. Proc. of the WI-IAT Workshop on Social Media Analysis (SMA07), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Lerman, A. Plangprasopchok, and C. Wong. Personalizing results of image search on flickr. In AAAI workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personlization, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Leskovec, L.A. Adamic, and B.A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. In EC '06: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 228--237, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/USENIX Internet Measurement Conference (IMC'07), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Mislove, K.P. Gummadi, and P. Druschel. Exploiting social networks for internet search. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets'06), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. E. J. Newman. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103(23):8577--8582, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani. Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E, 63(6):066117, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(14):3200--3203, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD '02: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 61--70, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Rose. Digg friends, 09/2006 http://diggtheblog.blogspot.com/2006/09/digg-friends.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Rose. A couple of updates, 02/01/2007 http://blog.digg.com/?p=60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. J. Salganik, P. S. Dodds, and D. J. Watts. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311:854, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2nd edition edition, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Wu, B. Huberman, L. Adamic, and J. Tyler. Information flow in social groups. Physica A, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. F. Wu and B. A. Huberman. Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(45):17599--17601, November 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WOSN '08: Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks
    August 2008
    92 pages
    ISBN:9781605581828
    DOI:10.1145/1397735

    Copyright © 2008 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 August 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate12of36submissions,33%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader