skip to main content
10.1145/1409635.1409663acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Protecting your daily in-home activity information from a wireless snooping attack

Published:21 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we first present a new privacy leak in residential wireless ubiquitous computing systems, and then we propose guidelines for designing future systems to prevent this problem. We show that we can observe private activities in the home such as cooking, showering, toileting, and sleeping by eavesdropping on the wireless transmissions of sensors in a home, even when all of the transmissions are encrypted. We call this the Fingerprint and Timing-based Snooping (FATS) attack. This attack can already be carried out on millions of homes today, and may become more important as ubiquitous computing environments such as smart homes and assisted living facilities become more prevalent. In this paper, we demonstrate and evaluate the FATS attack on eight different homes containing wireless sensors. We also propose and evaluate a set of privacy preserving design guidelines for future wireless ubiquitous systems and show how these guidelines can be used in a hybrid fashion to prevent against the FATS attack with low implementation costs.

References

  1. Anritsu high performance signal analyser. http://www.scs.carleton.ca/jhall2/Publications/anritsu_us.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Assisted living and residential monitoring network project. University of Virginia ALARMNET project, http://www.cs.virginia.edu/wsn/medical/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dark deal hacking wireless video cameras. http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/features/46880/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hagai Bar El, Introduction to Side Channel Attacks, http://www.hbarel.com/publications.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. United States department of health and human services, HIPAA regulations and standards. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. X10 home security home automation electronics. http://www.x10.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Toshihiro Takada et al, Proximity mining: Finding proximity using sensor data history. In WMCSA, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jing Deng Han et al, Countermeasures against traffic analysis attacks in wireless sensor networks. In SecureComm, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yi Yang et al, Towards event source unobservability with minimum network traffic in sensor networks. In WiSec, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Chaum. Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses and digital pseudonyms. In Communications of the ACM, pages 84--88, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. F. Dotzer. Privacy issues in vanet. In workshop on Privacy Enhanced Technology, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Ester, Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. B. Faria and D. R. Cheriton. Detecting identity-based attacks in wireless networks using signalprints. In Wise, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hall, M. Barbeau, and E. Kranakis. Enhancing intrusion detection in wireless networks using radio frequency fingerprinting. In Communications Internet and Information Technology, November 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Hall, M. Barbeau, and E. Kranakis. Detecting rogue devices in bluetooth networks using radio frequency fingerprinting. In IASTED International Conference on Communications and Computer Networks, October 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Kamat, Y. Zhang, W. Trappe, and C. Ozturk. Enhancing source location privacy in sensor network routing. In Int Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Kuhn. Electromagnetic eavesdropping risks of flat-panel displays. In Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Lim. Wireless fire sensor network demonstrator. Master's thesis, ETH Zurich, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. B. Logan, J. Healey, M. Philipose, E. M. Tapia, and S. Intille. A long-term evaluation of sensing modalities for activity recognition. In Ubicomp, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Pang, B. Greenstein, R. Gummadi, S. Seshan, and D. Wetherall. 802.11 user fingerprinting. In MobiCom, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Parks Associates Research and Analysis for Digital Living. Home security system forecasts: 2005 and beyond, November 2005. http://www.parksassociates.com/research/reports/tocs/2005/security.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. B. Rasmussen and S. Capkun. Implications of Radio Fingerprinting on the Security of Sensor Networks. Technical Report 536, ETH Zrich IFW, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Saponas, J. Lester, C. Hartung, S. Agarwal, and T. Kohno. Devices that tell on you privacy trends in consumer ubiquitous computing. In Usenix Security Symposium, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. E. M. Tapia, S. S. Intille, and K. Larson. Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In Proceedings of PERVASIVE, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Wyatt, M. Philipose, and T. Choudhury. Unsupervised activity recognition using automatically mined common sense. In AAAI, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Protecting your daily in-home activity information from a wireless snooping attack

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          UbiComp '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
          September 2008
          404 pages
          ISBN:9781605581361
          DOI:10.1145/1409635

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 September 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader