skip to main content
10.1145/142675.142737acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Intersection detection and separators for simple polygons

Published:01 July 1992Publication History

ABSTRACT

A simple algorithm is presented for detecting whether two preprocessed simple polygons intersect one another. Given a simple polygon, A, in O(n log n) time and O(n) space we preprocess A constructing an enveloping triangulation called a scaffold. To determine whether two preprocessed polygons A and B overlap another, we start with these two envelopes and successively strip away overlapping triangles of the scaffolds until we either detect an intersection between the objects or until we have succeeded in separating them spatially. The running time of the intersection query depends on the complexity of the minimum link polygonal curve separating the two objects. Given two preprocessed simple polygons A and B, placed at arbitrary locations in the plane we can determine whether these polygons intersect one another in O(m log2n is the total number of vertices and m is the complexity of a minimum link polygonal curve separating A from B. We generalize this to the problem of computing arbitrary Boolean functions of two preprocessed polygons.

References

  1. 1.B. Chazelle. Triangulating a simple polygon in linear time. In 31st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 220- 230, St. Louis, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.B. Chazelle a.nd D. P. Dobkin. Intersecion of convex objexts in two and three dimensions. Journal of the ACM, 34:1-27, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.B. Chazelle, H. Edelsbrunner, M. Grigni, L. Guibas, J. Hershberger, M. Sharir, and J. Snoeyink. Ray shooting in polygons using geodesic triangulations. In (In Proceedings of the 1991 ICALP) Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, number 510, pages 661-673, New York, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.B. Chazelle and L. J. Guibas. Visibility and intersection problems in plane geometry. Disscrete and Comptational Geometry, 4:551-581, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.L. P. Chew and K. Kedem. Placing the larg;est sirnilar copy of a cmwex polygon alnong polygonal obstacles. In Fifth ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pages 167-173, Saarbruchen, West Germany, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.D. P. Dobkin and D. G. Kirkpatrick. Determining the separation of preprocessed polyhedra: A unified approach, in Automata, Languages and Programming: 17th internatzonal Colloquium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 443, pages 400-413, Warwick University, England, 1990. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.H. Edelsbrunner. Computing the extreme distances bewteen two convex polygons. Journal of Algorithms, 6:213-224, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.S. J. Fortune. A fast algorithm for polygon containment by translation. In (In Proceedings of the 1985 ICALP) Sprznger Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 189-198, New York, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.L. Guibas and J. Stolfi. Primitives for the manipulation of general subdivisions and the computation of Voronoi diagrams. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 4:74-123, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.J. Hershberger and S. Suri. Private communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.T. C. Kao and D. M. Mount. An algorithm for computing compacted Voronoi diagrams defined by convex distance functions. In Proceedings of the Third Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, pages 104-109, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.D. Leven and M. Sharir. Planning a purely translational motion for a convex object in two-dimensional space using generalized Voronoi diagrams. Discrete and Complational Geometry, 2:9-31, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos. Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.H. Samet. The Design and Analysis of Spatial Data Structures. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.S. Suri. A linear time algorithm for minimum link paths inside a simple polygon. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 35:99-110, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Intersection detection and separators for simple polygons

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SCG '92: Proceedings of the eighth annual symposium on Computational geometry
        July 1992
        384 pages
        ISBN:0897915178
        DOI:10.1145/142675

        Copyright © 1992 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 July 1992

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader