skip to main content
10.1145/1460563.1460606acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The computational geowiki: what, why, and how

Published:08 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Google Maps and its spin-offs are highly successful, but they have a major limitation: users see only pictures of geographic data. These data are inaccessible except by limited vendor-defined APIs, and associated user data are weakly linked to them. But some applications require access, specifically geowikis and computational geowikis. We present the design and implementation of a computational geowiki. We also show empirically that both geowiki and computational geowiki features are necessary for a representative domain, bicycling, because (a) cyclists have useful knowledge unavailable except from cyclists and (b) cyclist-oriented automatic route-finding is enhanced by user input. Finally, we derive design implications: for example, user contributions presented within a route description are useful, and wikis should support contribution of opinion as well as fact.

References

  1. Adler, B. and Alfaro, L. A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. In Proc. WWW. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balram, S. and Dragićević, S., eds. Collaborative Geographic Information Systems. Idea Group Publishing, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Barsotti, E. and Kilgore, G. The road network is the bicycle network: Bicycle suitability measures for roadways and sidepaths. In Proc. Transport Chicago. 2001. http://bikelib.org/roads/roadnet.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bearden, M. J. The National Map Corps (2007). http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/position/Bearden paper.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bederson, B. B. et al. Enhancing in-car navigation systems with personal experience. In Proc. Transportation Research Board. 2008, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Beenen, G. et al. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In Proc. CSCW. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bird Studies Canada. Christmas bird count (2008). http://www.bsc-eoc.org/national/cbcmain.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, S. L. et al. Becoming Wikipedian. In Proc. GROUP. 2005, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrell, J. and Gay, G. E-graffiti: Evaluating real-world use of a context-aware system. Interacting with Computers, 14 (2002), 301--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cosley, D. How oversight improves member-maintained communities. In Proc. CHI. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cosley, D. et al. Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value. In Proc. CHI. 2006, 1037--1046. 16 http://cyclopath.org Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cosley, D. et al. SuggestBot: Using intelligent task routing to help people find work in Wikipedia. In Proc. IUI. 2007, 32--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Counts, S. and Smith, M. Where were we: Communities for Sharing Space-Time Trails. In Proc. ACMGIS. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Espinoza, F. et al. GeoNotes: Social and navigational aspects of location-based information systems. In Proc. Ubicomp. 2001, 2--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Giles, J. Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438 (2005), 900--901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Goodchild, M. F. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Harper, F. M. et al. Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In Proc. CHI. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hart, P. E. et al. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. TOSSC, 4, 2 (1968), 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Im, I. and Hars, A. Does a one-size recommendation system fit all? TOIS, 26, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kittur, A. et al. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In Proc. alt.CHI. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Konstan, J. A. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. CACM, 40, 3 (1997), 77--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lampe, C. and Resnick, P. Slash (dot) and burn: Distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. In Proc. CHI. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lo, C. P. and Yeung, A. K. W. Concepts and Techniques of Geographic Information Systems. Prentice Hall, 2006, 2nd edition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. MacEachren, A. M. Cartography and GIS: Facilitating collaboration. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 3 (2000), 445--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. NAVTEQ, Inc. NAVTEQ map reporter (2007). http://mapreporter.navteq.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Priedhorsky, R. et al. Creating, destroying and restoring value in Wikipedia. In Proc. GROUP. 2007, 259--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Priedhorsky, R. et al. How a personalized geowiki can help bicyclists share information more effectively. In Proc. WikiSym. 2007, 93--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ren, Y. et al. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28, 3 (2007), 377--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Schafer, W. A. et al. Designing the next generation of distributed, geocollaborative tools. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 52, 2 (2005), 81--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sen, S. et al. tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proc. CSCW. 2006, 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. TomTom. Get to know TomTom MapShare (2007). http://www.clubtomtom.com/general/get-to-know-tomtom-mapshare%E2%84%A2/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Viégas, F. B. et al. Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In Proc. CHI. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The computational geowiki: what, why, and how

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
          November 2008
          752 pages
          ISBN:9781605580074
          DOI:10.1145/1460563

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 November 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader