skip to main content
10.1145/1514095.1514104acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

I am my robot: the impact of robot-building and robot form on operators

Published:09 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

As robots become more pervasive, operators will develop richer relationships with them. In a 2 (robot form: humanoid vs. car) x 2 (assembler: self vs. other) between-participants experiment (N=56), participants assembled either a humanoid or car robot. Participants then used, in the context of a game, either the robot they built or a different robot. Participants showed greater extension of their self-concept into the car robot and preferred the personality of the car robot over the humanoid robot. People showed greater self extension into a robot and preferred the personality of the robot they assembled over a robot they believed to be assembled by another. Implications for the theory and design of robots and human-robot interaction are discussed.

References

  1. Bartneck, C., Reichenbach, J., and Carpenter, J. 2006. Use of praise and punishment in human-robot collaborative teams. Proceedings of ROMAN (Hatfield, UK, September 6-8, 2006). ROMAN '06. IEEE, 177--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Belk, R. W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Burris, C. T., and Rempel, J. K. 2004. It's the end of the world as we know it,: Threat and the spatial-symbolic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 19--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Casper, J., & Murphy, R. R. (2003). Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, IEEE Transactions, 33(3), 367--385 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Duffy, B.R. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Epley, N., Caruso, E.M., and Bazerman, M.H. 2006. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864--886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., and Dautenhahn. K. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 143--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S. Setlock, L. D., and Yew, V. 2008. How people anthropomorphize robots. Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 12-15, 2008). HRI '08. ACM Press, New York, NY, 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Galinsky, A. D., and Moskowitz, G. B. 2000. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708--724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. 2003. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (San Francisco, CA). ROMAN '03.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hegel, F., Krach, S., Kircher, T., Wrede, B., and Sagerer, G. 2008. Understanding social robots: A user study on anthropomorphism. Proceedings of Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Munich, Germany, August 1-3, 2008), 574--579.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ju, W. and Takayama, L. In Press. Approachability: How people interpret automatic door movement as gesture. Proceedings of Design and Emotion (Hong Kong, China).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kiesler, T., and Kiesler, S. 2005. My pet rock and me: An experimental exploration of the self extension concept. Advances in Consumer Research, 32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., and Kircher, T. 2008. Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS ONE, 3(7).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim, S. 2006. The effect of avatar choice and visual POV on game play experiences. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: 3209006. Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nass, C., Steuer, J.S., and Tauber, E. 1994. Computers are social actors. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA, April 24-28, 1994). CHI '94. ACM Press, New York, NY, 72--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rosenblatt, P. C., Walsh, P. R., and Jackson, D. A. 1976. Grief and morning in cross cultural perspective. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395--412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. I am my robot: the impact of robot-building and robot form on operators

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
      March 2009
      348 pages
      ISBN:9781605584041
      DOI:10.1145/1514095

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader