skip to main content
article
Free Access

Multiple comparisons with the best for steady-state simulation

Published:02 January 1993Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Multiple-comparison procedures are useful for comparing the performance of competing systems via simulation. In this paper we extend a particular multiple-comparison procedure, multiple comparisons with the best, to steady-state simulation by using an autoregressive-output-analysis method.

References

  1. 1 A~IKE, H. Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian auto-regressive moving average process. B~ometrtka 60, 2 (Aug. 1973), 255-266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Box, G. E. P., ~u JENKINS, G. M. Time Series Analysis. Rev. ed. Holden-Day, San Francisco, Calif., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 FISHM~N, G.S. Principles of Discrete Event Simulation. Wiley, New York, 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 G~~, H. L., KELLY, G. D., AND MCINT~RE, D. D. A new approach to ARMA modelling. Commun. Stat. B7 (1978), 1-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 HANNa, E. J. Multiple Time Series. Wiley, New York, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 HANNAN, E. J., McDOUGALL, A. J., AND POSKITT, D.S. Recursive estimation of autoregressions. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B51, 2 (1989), 217 233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 HEMERL~, E. M., AND DAVIS M. H. A. Strong consistency of the PLS criterion for order determination of autoregressive processes. Ann. Stat. 17, 2 (1989), 941 946.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 HOCHBERG, Y., AND TAMHANE, A. C. Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley, New York, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Hsu, J. C. Constrained simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the best. Ann. Stat. 12, 3 (1984), 1136 1144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10 Hsu, J. C. Ranking and selection and multiple comparisons with the best. In Design of Experiments: Ranking and Selection, T. J. Santner and A. C. Tamhane, Eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984, chap. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Hsu, J. C, AND NELSON, B.L. Optimization over a finite number of system designs with one-stage sampling and multiple comparisons with the best. In Proceedings of the 1988 Winter Simulation Conference (San Diego, Calif., Dec. 12-14). ACM/IEEE, New York, 1988, 451-457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 NELSON, B. L., AND HSU, J. C. Control-variate models of common random numbers for multiple comparisons with the best. Manage. Sct. To be published. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 RISSANEN, J. Order estimation by accumulated prediction errors. In Essays in Time Series and Allied Processes. J. Gani and M. B. Priestly, Eds. J. Appl. Prob. 23A (1986), 55-61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 YUAN, M., AND NELSON, B. L. Autoregressive output analysis methods revisited. Working Paper Ser. 1991-007, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multiple comparisons with the best for steady-state simulation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
          ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 3, Issue 1
          Jan. 1993
          79 pages
          ISSN:1049-3301
          EISSN:1558-1195
          DOI:10.1145/151527
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1993 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 January 1993
          Published in tomacs Volume 3, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader