skip to main content
10.1145/1517744.1517793acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile service audio notifications: intuitive semantics and noises

Published:08 December 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is hoped that context-aware systems will present users with an increasing number of relevant services in an increasingly wide range of contexts. With this expansion, numerous service notifications could overwhelm users. Therefore, careful design of the notification mechanism is needed. In this paper, we investigate how semantic richness of different types of audio stimuli can be utilised to shape the intuitiveness of mobile service notifications. In order to do so, we first develop a categorisation of mobile services so that clustered services can share the same notifications. Not surprisingly, it was found that overall speech performed better than non-speech sounds, and auditory icons performed overall better than earcons. However, exceptions were observed when richer semantics were utilised in the seemingly poorer medium. We argue that success and subjective preference of auditory mobile service notifications heavily depends on the success and level of directness of the metaphors used.

References

  1. Baber, C. and Noyes, J. M., Eds. (1993). Interactive Speech Technology: Human Factors Issues in the Application of Speech Input/Output to Computers. Taylor & Francis, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blattner, M. M., Papp, A. L. III, & Glinert, E. P. (1994). Sonic enhancement of two-dimensional graphic displays. In Kramer, G. (ed.), Auditory Display. New York: Addison-Wesley, 447--470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blattner, M. M., Sumikawa, D. A., Greenberg, R. M. (1989). Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles. SIGCHI Bull. 21(1), pp. 123--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Block Jr F. E., N. L., Ballast B., (1999). Optimization of Alarms: A Study on Alarm Limits, Alarm Sounds, and False Alarms, Intended to Reduce Annoyance. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 15 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bonebright, T. L., & Nees, M. A. (2007). Memory for auditory icons and earcons with localization cues. Proc. ICAD 2007 -- Thirteenth Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display, pp. 419--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewster, S. (2002). Overcoming the Lack of Screen Space on Mobile Computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6(3), pp. 188--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brewster, S. A. (1998). Using non-speech sounds to provide navigation cues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(2), pp 224--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brewster, S. A., Wright, P. C., Edwards, A. D. N. (1993). An Evaluation of Earcons for use in Auditory Human-Computer Interfaces. Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 222--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cohen, J. (1994). Monitoring Background Activities. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification and Auditory interfaces, pp. 499--522.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Edworthy, J., Hards, R. (1999). Learning Auditory Warnings: The Effects of Sound Type, Verbal Labelling and Imagery on the Identification of Alarm Sounds. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), pp. 603--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gaver, W. W. (1997). Auditory Interfaces. Handbook of Human--Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaver, W. W. (1989). The SonicFinder: An Interface That Uses Auditory Icons. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(1), pp. 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gaver, W. W. (1986) Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Computer Interfaces. In Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), pp. 167--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Geven, A., Sefelin, R., Tscheligi, M. (2006). Depth and Breadth away from the desktop - Optimal Information Hierarchies for Mobile Use, Proc. MobileHCI, pp. 157--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Graham, R. (1999). Use of Auditory Icons as Emergency Warnings: Evaluation within a Vehicle Collision Avoidance Application. Ergonomics, 42 (9), pp. 1233--1248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hickling, E. M. (1994). Ergonomics and engineering aspects of designing an alarm system for a modern nuclear power plant. In Human Factors in Alarm Design, N. Stanton, Ed. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PA, 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Ranganathan, D. (2002) Hubbub: A Sound-Enhanced Mobile Instant Messenger that Supports Awareness and Opportunistic Interactions. Proc. Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), pp. 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Keller, P., Stevens, C. (2004). Meaning from Environmental Sounds: Types of Signal-Referent Relations and their Effect on Recognizing Auditory Icons. J Exp Psychol Appl, 10(1), pp. 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Leplatre, G. and Brewster, S. A. (2000). Designing nonspeech sounds to support navigation in mobile phone menus. In, Cook, P. R., Eds. 6th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD), pp. 190--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Leung, Y. K., Smith, S., Parker, S., & Martin, R. (1997) Learning and Retention of Auditory Warnings. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Auditory Display.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nass, C. and Gong, L. (2000). Speech interfaces from an evolutionary perspective. Communications of the ACM 43, 9, pp. 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Patterson, R. D., Mayfield, T. F. (1990). Auditory Warning Sounds in the Work Environment {and Discussion}. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 327(1241), Human Factors in Hazardous Situations, pp. 485--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Rigas, D., Alty, J. (2005). The rising pitch metaphor: an empirical study, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 62, Issue 1, January 2005, pp 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sorkin, R. D. (1987). Design of auditory and tactile displays. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 549--576). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevens, R., Brewster, S., Wright, P., & Edwards, A. (1994). Design and evaluation of an auditory glance at algebra for blind readers. In G. Kramer and S. Smith (eds.), Proc 2nd International Conference on Auditory Display, pp. 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ulfvengren, P. (2003). Design of Natural Warning Sounds in Human-Machine Systems. PhD thesis, Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker, B. N., Kramer, G. (2005). Mappings and Metaphors in Auditory Displays: An Experimental Assessment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2(4), pp. 407--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mobile service audio notifications: intuitive semantics and noises

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OZCHI '08: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat
      December 2008
      366 pages
      ISBN:0980306345
      DOI:10.1145/1517744

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 December 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OZCHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate28of57submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader