skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518842acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graspables: grasp-recognition as a user interface

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Graspables project is an exploration of how measuring the way people hold and manipulate objects can be used as a user interface. As computational ability continues to be implemented in more and more objects and devices, new interaction methods need to be developed. The Graspables System is embodied by a physical set of sensors combined with pattern recognition software that can determine how users hold a device. The Graspables System has been implemented in two prototypes, the Bar of Soap and the Ball of Soap. Applications developed for these prototypes demonstrate the effectiveness of grasp-recognition as an interface in multiple scenarios.

References

  1. ngeslevä, J., Oakley, I. and Hughes, S. Body Mnemonics: Portable Device Interaction Design Concept. In Proc. of Info. Vis. (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, W., Kim, K.E., Lee, H., Cho, J.K., Soh, B.S., Shim, J.H., Yang, G., Cho, S. and Park, J. Recognition of Grip-Patterns by Using Capacitive Touch Sensors. IEEE ISIE 2006, 4 (2006), 2936--2941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D. Pattern Classification, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fitzmaurice, G.W., Ishii, H. and Buxton, W. Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. CHI 1995: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press (1995), 442--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fitzmaurice, G.W. and Buxton, W. An Empirical Evaluation of Graspable User Interfaces: Towards Specialized, Space-Multiplexed Input. CHI 1997: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press (1997), 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Harrison, B.L., Fishkin, K.P., Gujar, A., Mochon, C., and Want, R. Squeeze Me, Hold Me, Tilt Me! In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press (1998), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kim, K.E., Chang, W., Cho, S., Shim, J., Lee, H., Park, J., Lee, Y., Kim, S. Hand Grip Pattern Recognition for Mobile User Interfaces. In Proc. of AAAI 2006. (2006), 1789--1794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kry, P.G. and Pai, D.K. Grasp Recognition and Manipulation with the Tango. Int. Symposium on Experimental Robotics. (2006), 551--559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mäntylä, V.M., Mantyjarvi, J., Seppanen, T. and Tuulari, E. Hand Gesture Recognition of a Mobile Device User. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia and Expo. 1 (2000), 281--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. MacKenzie, C.L., Iberall, T. The Grasping Hand. Elsevier, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pai, D.K., VanDerLoo, E.W., Sadhukhan, S. and Kry, P.G. The Tango: A Tangible Tangoreceptive Whole-Hand Human Interface. In Proc. of World Haptics. (2005), 141--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rabiner, L.R. A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition. In Proc. of the IEEE. Vol. 77, no.2, (1989), 257--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rekimoto, J. Tilting Operations for Small Screen Interfaces. In Proc. of 9th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. (1996), 167--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Stiehl, W.D. and Breazeal, C. Affective Touch for Robotic Companions. At 1st Int. Conf. on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stiehl, W.D., Leiberman, J., Breazeal, C., Basel, L., Lalla, L., and Wolf, M. Design of Therapeutic Robotic Companion for Relational, Affective Touch. 2005 IEEE Int. Workshop of Robots and Human Interactive Communication. (2005), 408--415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor, B.T. and Bove, V.M. The Bar of Soap: A Grasp Recognition System Implemented in a Multi-Functional Handheld Device. CHI 2008: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2008), 3459--3464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American. Vol. 265, no. 3, Sept. 1991, 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Graspables: grasp-recognition as a user interface

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2009
        2426 pages
        ISBN:9781605582467
        DOI:10.1145/1518701

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader