skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518864acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current multi-touch interaction techniques typically only use the x-y coordinates of the human finger's contact with the screen. However, when fingers contact a touch-sensitive surface, they usually approach at an angle and cover a relatively large 2D area instead of a precise single point. In this paper, a Frustrated Total Internal Reflection (FTIR) based multi-touch device is used to collect the finger imprint data. We designed a series of experiments to explore human finger input properties and identified several useful properties such as contact area, contact shape and contact orientation which can be exploited to improve the performance of multi-touch selecting and pointing tasks. Based on the experimental results, we discuss some implications for the design of human finger input interfaces and propose several design prototypes which incorporate these implications. A set of raw data and several concrete recommendations which are useful for the research community are also presented.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1518864.mp4

mp4

109.5 MB

References

  1. 1. Albinsson, P. and Zhai, S. High precision touch screen interaction. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anderson, R.E. Social impacts of computing: Codes of professional ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 4 (1992), 453--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. APPLE. Multi-touch gesture dictionary (2008). US Patent 20070177803Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., and Baudisch, P. Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1263--1272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buxton, W. Multi-touch systems that i have known and loved (2008). http://www.billbuxton.com/multitouchOverview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Buxton, W., Hill, R., and Rowley, P. Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 1985, ACM Press (1985), 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. Diamondtouch: a multi-user touch technology. In Proc. UIST 2001, ACM Press (2001), 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 647--656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hall, A.D., Cunningham, J.B., Roache, R.P., and Cox, J.W. Factors affecting performance using touch-entry systems: Tactual recognition fields and system accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4 (1988), 711--720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Han, J.Y. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press (2005), 115--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Herot, C.F. and Weinzapfel, G. One-point touch input of vector information for computer displays. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 1978, ACM Press (1978), 210--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kabbash, P. and Buxton, W.A.S. The"prince technique: Fitts' law and selection using area cursors. In Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1995), 273--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kaltenbrunner, M., Bovermann, T., Bencina, R., and Costanza, E. Tuio - a protocol for table based tangible user interfaces. In 6th International Workshop on Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, S., Buxton, W., and Smith, K.C. A multi-touch three dimensional touch-sensitive tablet. In Proc. CHI 1985, ACM Press (1985), 21--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nuigroup. Touchlib: A multi-touch development kit (2008). http://nuigroup.com/touchlib/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patwardhan, A. Subpixel position measurement using 1d, 2d and 3d centroid algorithms with emphasis on applications in confocal microscopy. Journal of Microscopy, 3 (1997), 246--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Potter, R.L., Weldon, L.J., and Shneiderman, B. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. In Proc. CHI 1988, ACM Press (1988), 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ramos, G., Boulos, M., and Balakrishnan, R. Pressure widgets. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 487--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Reetz, A., Gutwin, C., Stach, T., Nacenta, M., and Subramanian, S. Superflick: a natural and efficient technique for long-distance object placement on digital tables. In Proc. GI 2006, Canadian Information Processing Society (2006), 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rekimoto, J. Smartskin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies34 (1991), 593--613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. SMART. Smart technologies inc. (2008). http://www.smarttech.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 657--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wilson, A.D. Touchlight: an imaging touch screen and display for gesture-based interaction. In Proc. ICMI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 69--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wilson, A.D. Playanywhere: a compact interactive tabletop projection-vision system. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press (2005), 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wilson, A.D., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Garcia-Mendoza, A., and Kirk, D. Bringing physics to the surface. In Proc. UIST 2008, ACM Press (2008), 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wu, M. and Balakrishnan, R. Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In Proc. UIST 2003, ACM Press (2003), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader