skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518896acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

FacetLens: exposing trends and relationships to support sensemaking within faceted datasets

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown that faceted browsing is effective and enjoyable in searching and browsing large collections of data. In this work, we explore the efficacy of interactive visualization systems in supporting exploration and sensemaking within faceted datasets. To do this, we developed an interactive visualization system called FacetLens, which exposes trends and relationships within faceted datasets. FacetLens implements linear facets to enable users not only to identify trends but also to easily compare several trends simultaneously. Furthermore, it offers pivot operations to allow users to navigate the faceted dataset using relationships between items. We evaluate the utility of the system through a description of insights gained while experts used the system to explore the CHI publication repository as well as a database of funding grant data, and report a formative user study that identified usability issues.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1293.wmv

wmv

18.6 MB

References

  1. Ahlberg, C. Spotfire: an information exploration environment. ACM SIGMOD Record, 25, 4 (1996), 25--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bungee View, http://cityscape.inf.cs.cmu.edu/bungeeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Gapminder, http://www.gapminder.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Havre, S., Elizabeth, H., Whitney, P., and Nowell, L. ThemeRiver: Visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8, 1 (2002), 9--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kang, H., Plaisant, C., Lee, B., and Bederson, B.B. NetLens: Iterative Exploration of Content-Actor Network Data. Information Visualization Special Issue on Visual Analytics, 6 (2007), 18--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Klein, G., Moon, B., and Hoffman, R.F. Making sense of sensemaking I: alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21, 4 (2006), 70--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lee, B., Czerwinski, M., Robertson, G., and Bederson, B.B. Understanding research trends in conferences using PaperLens. Extended Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1969--1972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mackinlay, J., Hanrahan, P., and Stolte, C. Show Me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13, 6 (2007), 1137--1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Microsoft Office Excel, http://office.microsoft.com/enus/excelGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ranganathan, R. Colon Classification: Basic Classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robertson, G., Fernandez, R., Fisher, D., Lee, B., and Stasko, J. Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization, IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14, 6 (2008), 1325--1332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Smith, G., Czerwinski, M., Meyers, B., Robbins, D., Robertson, G., and Tan, D. FacetMap: A scalable search and browse visualization. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 5 (2006), 797--804. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Spenke, M. and Beilken, C. InfoZoom - Analysing formula one racing results with an interactive data mining and visualization tool. Proc. Data Mining 2000, (2000), 455--464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stolte, C., Tang, D., and Hanrahan, P. Polaris: a system for query, analysis, and visualization of multidimensional relational databases. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8, 1 (2002), 52--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wattenberg, M. Baby names, visualization, and social data analysis. Proc. InfoVis 2005, IEEE (2005), 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), http://windowsclient.netGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wong, P.C., Hetzler, B., Posse, C., Whiting, M., Havre, S., Cramer, N., Shah, A., Singhal, M., Turner, A., and Thomas, J. IN-SPIRE InfoVis 2004 Contest Entry. Posters Compendium of InfoVis 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yee, P., Swearingen, K., Li, K., and Hearst, M. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 401--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zhang, J. and Marchionini, G. Evaluation and evolution of a browse and search interface: Relation Browser++. Proc. Digital Government Research 2005, (2005), 179--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. FacetLens: exposing trends and relationships to support sensemaking within faceted datasets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader