skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519013acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Clinical evaluations and collaborative design: developing new technologies for mental healthcare interventions

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ethical requirements, severe constraints on access to end users and the necessity of real-world clinical evaluations represent significant challenges to designers of new technologies in mental healthcare (MHC) settings. This paper describes the collaborative approaches, incorporating HCI methods with input for MHC professionals and MHC theory, which were applied in the development of Personal Investigator (PI), a 3D computer game developed to support adolescent mental health interventions. Different stages in the evaluation of PI are discussed and the lessons learned through a multi-site clinical evaluation are presented. This evaluation has provided strong initial evidence that games such as PI offer the potential to improve adolescent engagement in talk-based interventions. It has also provided an insight into factors which should be considered in future designs in the MHC domain, e.g. the need to incorporate high levels of adaptability in future systems. Based on the difficulties encountered and lessons learned critical aims for future research are outlined.

References

  1. Surgeon General, Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. 1999, Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium, Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004. 291(21).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BMA, Child and adolescent mental health - a guide for healthcare professionals. 2006, Board of Science of the British Medical Association: London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Coyle, D., G. Doherty, J. Sharry and M. Matthews, Computers in Talk-Based Mental Health Care. Interacting with Computers, 2007. 19(4): p. 545--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Matthews, M., G. Doherty, D. Coyle and J. Sharry, Designing mobile applications to support mental health interventions, in Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology, J. Lumsden, Editor. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gulliksen, J., B. Göransson, I. Boivie, S. Blomkvist, J. Persson and Å. Cajander, Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2003. 22(6): p. 397--410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 1964--2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sainfort, F., J.A. Jacko and B.C. Booske, Human-Computer Interaction in Health Care, in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook - Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, J.A. Jacko and A. Sears, Editors. 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, New Jersey. p. 808--822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Johnson, C.M., T.R. Johnson and J. Zhang, A user-centred framework for redesigning health care interfaces. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2005. 38(1): p. 75--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Newell, A.F. and P. Gregor. User Sensitive Inclusive Design - in search of a new paradigm. In CUU'00, ACM Conference on Universal Usability, 2000. Arlington, VA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Boyd-Graber, J., S. Nikolova, K. Moffatt, K. Kin, J. Lee, L. Mackey, M. Tremaine and M. Klawe. Participatory Design with Proxies: Developing a Desktop-PDA System to Support People with Aphasia. In CHI'06, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, 2006. Montréal, Québec, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. McFarlane, A., A. Sparrowhawk and Y. Heald, Report on Educational Use of Games: Teachers Evaluating Educational Multimedia, 2002, TEEM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentile, D.A. and D.A. Walsh, A normative study of family media habits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2002. 23: p. 157--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Schaefer, C.E. and S.E. Reid, eds. Game play: therapeutic use of childhood games. 2001, Chichester: Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Coyle, D., M. Matthews, J. Sharry, A. Nisbet and G. Doherty, Personal Investigator: A Therapeutic 3D Game for Adolescent Psychotherapy. International Journal of Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2005. 2(2): p. 73--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirriemuir, J. and A. McFarlane, Literature Review in Games and Learning. 2004, NESTA Futurelab: Bristol.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kato, P.M., Factors Affecting Acceptability to Young Cancer Patients of a Psychoeducational Video Game About Cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 2006. 23(5): p. 269--275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindley, C.A. Conditioning, Learning and Creation in Games: Narrative, The Gameplay Gestalt and Creative Simulation. In NILE2002, Narrative Interaction and Learning Environments. 2002. Edinburgh.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. De Shazer, S., Clues: Investigating Solutions in Brief Therapy. 1st edition ed. 1988, New York, N.Y.: W. W. Norton&Company. 202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott, J., L. Adams and A. Bruckman. No Magic Bullet: 3d Video Games in Education. In ICLS2002 International Conference of the Learning Sciences. 2002. Seattle.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jinks, G., Specific Strategies and Techniques, in Handbook of Counselling and Psychotherapy, C. Feltham and I. Horton, Editors. 2000, Sage Publications: London. p. 122--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Botella, C., R. Baños, B. Rey, M. Alcañiz, V. Guillen, S. Quero and A. García-Palacios. Using an adaptive display for the treatment of emotional disorders: a preliminary analysis of effectiveness. Extended abstract in CHI'06, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2006. Montréal, Québec, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Clinical evaluations and collaborative design: developing new technologies for mental healthcare interventions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader