skip to main content
10.1145/1520340.1520651acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

'Broken Expectations' from a global business perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Especially in the past few years, there has been an increase in the rejection rate of interactive consumer electronics products in the field, not due to broken hardware or software, but due to 'broken expectations' of users. However, operational methods to capture triggering contextual reasons are not functional in the industry. In addressing this gap, we propose systematic analysis of qualitative user feedback data resources from the field by utilizing our Disconfirmed Expectations Ontology (DEO). DEO provides for an efficient means to elicit relevant -but currently unrecognizable- feedback from the field to communicate that to the respective units in a product development process. We further demonstrate the utilization of DEO on a rich qualitative data set regarding the Apple iPhone".

References

  1. Bly, S., Schilit, B., McDonald, D.W., Rosario, B., and Saint-Hilarie, Y. Broken Expectations in the Digital Home. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, (2006), 568--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bouwmeester, K. den and Bosma, E. Phases of Use: A means to Identify Factors that Influence Product Utilization. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, (2006), 117--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Karapanos, E., Hassenzahl, M., and Martens, J.-B. User Experience over Time. CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press (2008), 3561--3566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Koca, A., Schouwenaar, A.J.M. and Brombacher, A.C. Field-Feedback in Innovative Product Development: A Comparison of Two Industrial Approaches. Proc. IPDM 2007, (2007), 657--668.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Koca, A., and Brombacher, A.C. Extracting "Broken Expectations" from Call Center Records: Why and How. CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, (2008), 2985--2990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Koca, A., Funk, M., Karapanos, E., Rozinat, A., and Gaarden, N.v.d. Grasping Product Pragmatics: A Case with Internet on TV. Proc. UXTV 2008, ACM Press (2008), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ouden, E. d., Lu, Y., Sonnemans, P.J.M., and Brombacher, A.C. Quality and Reliability Problems from a Consumer's Perspective: An Increasing Problem Overlooked by Businesses? Quality and Reliability Engineering International 22, 7 (2006), 821--838.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Overton, D. "No Fault Found" Returns Cost the Mobile Industry $4.5 Billion per Year. WDS Global Media Bulletin, July 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 'Broken Expectations' from a global business perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2470 pages
      ISBN:9781605582474
      DOI:10.1145/1520340

      Copyright © 2009 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '09 Paper Acceptance Rate385of1,130submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader