skip to main content
10.1145/1526709.1526809acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The slashdot zoo: mining a social network with negative edges

Published:20 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We analyse the corpus of user relationships of the Slashdot technology news site. The data was collected from the Slashdot Zoo feature where users of the website can tag other users as friends and foes, providing positive and negative endorsements. We adapt social network analysis techniques to the problem of negative edge weights. In particular, we consider signed variants of global network characteristics such as the clustering coefficient, node-level characteristics such as centrality and popularity measures, and link-level characteristics such as distances and similarity measures. We evaluate these measures on the task of identifying unpopular users, as well as on the task of predicting the sign of links and show that the network exhibits multiplicative transitivity which allows algebraic methods based on matrix multiplication to be used. We compare our methods to traditional methods which are only suitable for positively weighted edges.

References

  1. A. T. Balaban and D. J. Klein. Co-authorship, rational ErdQs numbers, and resistance distances in graphs. Scientometrics, 55(1):59--70, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Chebotarev and E. V. Shamis. On proximity measures for graph vertices. Automation and Remote Control 10, 59:1443--1459, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. de Kerchove and P. V. Dooren. The PageTrust algorithm: how to rank web pages when negative links are allowed? In Proc. SIAM Int. Conf. on Data Mining, pages 346--352, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. F. Fouss, A. Pirotte, J.-M. Renders, and M. Saerens. Random-walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative recommendation. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(3):355--369, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In Proc. Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 403--412, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. V. Gómez, A. Kaltenbrunner, and V. López. Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in Slashdot. In Proc. Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 645--654, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Hage and F. Harary. Structural Models in Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 230--237, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Hogg, D. Wilkinson, G. Szabo, and M. Brzozowski. Multiple relationship types in online communities and social networks. In Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Social Information Processing, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Hou. Bounds for the least Laplacian eigenvalue of a signed graph. Acta Mathematica Sinica, 21(4):955--960, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Ito, M. Shimbo, T. Kudo, and Y. Matsumoto. Application of kernels to link analysis. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, pages 586--592, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Kalna and D. J. Higham. A clustering coefficient for weighted networks, with application to gene expression data. AI Commun., 20(4):263--271, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. D. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser, and H. Garcia-Molina. The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 640--651, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Kandola, J. Shawe-taylor, and N. Cristianini. Learning semantic similarity. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 657--664, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. J. Klein and M. Randiff. Resistance distance. Mathematical Chemistry, 12(1):81--95, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. Kondor and J. Lafferty. Diffusion kernels on graphs and other discrete structures. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 315--322, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Kunegis, S. Schmidt, C. Bauckhage, M. Mehlitz, and S. Albayrak. Modeling collaborative similarity with the signed resistance distance kernel. In Proc. Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 261--265, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Lampe and E. Johnston. Follow the (Slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Supporting Group Work, pages 11--20, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 556--559, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. A. Najork, H. Zaragoza, and M. J. Taylor. Hits on the web: how does it compare? In Proc. Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 471--478, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. E. J. Newman. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27(1):39--54, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Scott. Social Network Analysis: a Handbook. Sage Publications, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and Y. Koren. Fast direction-aware proximity for graph mining. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 747--756, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684):440--442, June 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S. White and P. Smyth. Algorithms for estimating relative importance in networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 266--275, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Yang, W. Cheung, and J. Liu. Community mining from signed social networks. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 19(10):1333--1348, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The slashdot zoo: mining a social network with negative edges

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web
      April 2009
      1280 pages
      ISBN:9781605584874
      DOI:10.1145/1526709

      Copyright © 2009 IW3C2 org

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader