skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529416acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Partitioning web applications between the server and the client

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web 2.0 and rich Internet application technologies are offering more and more sophisticated means for building compelling applications. At the same time the development of applications is becoming increasingly complex. While web applications are commonly relying on server-side processing, we aim at implementing a "fat client" and running applications mostly on the client. With this in mind we can derive a set of guidelines on how the applications should be partitioned between the server and the client. By following these directives and leaning on the traditional principles of good software development, we can address the issues of complexity that have lately emerged in web development.

References

  1. W. W. W. Consortium. Document object model. http://www.w3.org/DOM/, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. W. W. W. Consortium. Html 5. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Crockford. Json. RFC 4627, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Flanagan. JavaScript: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Ford. Art of Java Web Development: Struts, Tapestry, Commons, Velocity, JUnit, Axis, Cocoon, InternetBeans, WebWork. Manning Publications, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Foundation. The same origin policy. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/components/same-origin.html, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Foundation. Rhino: Javascript for java. http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Foundation. Spidermonkey (javascript-c) engine. http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. J. Garrett. Ajax: A new approach to web application. http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000385.php, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Google. Google gears. http://gears.google.com/, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. T. H. III. Ajax: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Inc. Jaxer. http://aptana.com/jaxer, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Krasner and S. Pope. A cookbook for using model-view-controller user interface paradigm in smalltalk-80. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. E. A. Mayer. CSS: The Definitive Guide, Third Edition. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Mikkonen and A. Taivalsaari. Web applications -- spaghetti code for the 21st century. Technical report, Sun Microsystems, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Musciano and B. Kennedy. HTML: The Definitive Guide, Third Edition. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. T. Ray. Learning XML, Second Edition. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Russell. Comet: Low latency data for the browser. http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/?p=545, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Russell. Comet: Low latency data for the browser. http://alex.dojotoolkit.org/wp-content/LowLatencyData.pdf, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Russell, G. Wilkins, D. Davis, and M. Nesbitt. Bayeux protocol. Technical report, The Dojo Foundation, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Taivalsaari, T. Mikkonen, D. Ingalls, and K. Palacz. Web browser as an application platform: The lively kernel experience. Technical report, Sun Microsystems, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. F. Zammetti. Practical DWR 2 Projects. Apress, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Zumbrunn. Helma. http://dev.helma.org/, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Partitioning web applications between the server and the client

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
      March 2009
      2347 pages
      ISBN:9781605581668
      DOI:10.1145/1529282

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader