skip to main content
10.1145/1571941.1572033acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The wisdom of the few: a collaborative filtering approach based on expert opinions from the web

Published:19 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nearest-neighbor collaborative filtering provides a successful means of generating recommendations for web users. However, this approach suffers from several shortcomings, including data sparsity and noise, the cold-start problem, and scalability. In this work, we present a novel method for recommending items to users based on expert opinions. Our method is a variation of traditional collaborative filtering: rather than applying a nearest neighbor algorithm to the user-rating data, predictions are computed using a set of expert neighbors from an independent dataset, whose opinions are weighted according to their similarity to the user. This method promises to address some of the weaknesses in traditional collaborative filtering, while maintaining comparable accuracy. We validate our approach by predicting a subset of the Netflix data set. We use ratings crawled from a web portal of expert reviews, measuring results both in terms of prediction accuracy and recommendation list precision. Finally, we explore the ability of our method to generate useful recommendations, by reporting the results of a user-study where users prefer the recommendations generated by our approach.

References

  1. ]]G. Adomavicius and A.Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. ]]X. Amatriain, J.M. Pujol, and N. Oliver. I like it... i like it not: Evaluating user ratings noise in recommender systems. In Proc. of the 2009 Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. ]]I. Titov and R. McDonald. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In Proc. of WWW '08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. ]]K. Balog, T. Bogers, L. Azzopardi, M. deRijke, and A. vanden Bosch. Broad expertise retrieval in sparse data environments. In Proc. of SIGIR '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. ]]M. Harper, X. Li, Y. Chen, and J. Konstan. An economic model of user rating in an online recommender system. In Proc. of UM 05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. ]]Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proc. of WWW '01, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. ]]J.L. Herlocker, J.A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. An empirical analysis of design choices in neighborhood-based collaborative filtering algorithms. Information Retrieval, (5):287--310, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. ]]H. Ma, I. King, and M.R. Lyu. Effective missing data prediction for collaborative filtering. In Proc. of SIGIR '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. ]]P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW'94 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pages 175--186, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. ]]R. Bell and Y. Koren. Scalable collaborative filtering with jointly derived neighborhood interpolation weights. In Proc. of IEEE ICDM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. ]]M. Deshpande and G. Karypis. Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):143--177, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. ]]G. Karypis. Evaluation of item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. In CIKM '01: Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Information and knowledge management, pages 247--254, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. ]]M.R. McLaughlin and J.L. Herlocker. A collaborative filtering algorithm and evaluation metric that accurately model the user experience. In Proc. of SIGIR '04, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. ]]C. Ziegler, S.M. McNee, J.A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proc. of WWW '05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. ]]C. Basu, H. Hirsh, and W. Cohen. Recommendation as classification: Using social and content-based information in recommendation. In AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. ]]Choicestream. Personalization Survey. Technical report, Choicestream Inc., 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ]]Kirsten Swearingen and Rashmi Sinha. Beyond algorithms: An hci perspective on recommender systems. In ACM SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Recommender Systems, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ]]PandoraScience Science. Rockin' to the Music Genome. Science, 311(5765):1223d--, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ]]J. Cho, K. Kwon, and Y. Park. Collaborative filtering using dual information sources. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(3):30--38, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. ]]J. O'Donovan and B. Smyth. Trust in recommender systems. In IUI '05: Proc. of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 167--174, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. ]]M. Mahony, N. Hurley, and G. Silvestre. Detecting noise in recommender system databases. In Proceedings of the 2006 IUI, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. ]]J. Ford, S. Zhang, Y. Ouyang and F. Makedon. Analysis of a low-dimensional linear model under recommendation attacks. In Proc. of SIGIR '06, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. ]]B. Mehta and W. Nejdl. Attack resistant collaborative filtering. In Proc. of SIGIR '08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. ]]X.N. Lam, T. Vu, T.D. Le, and A.D. Duong. Addressing cold-start problem in recommendation systems. In ICUIMC '08: Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Ubiquitous Inf. Manag. and Comm., pages 208--211, New York, NY, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. ]]G. Xue, C. Lin, Q. Yang, W. Xi, H. Zeng, Y. Yu, and Z. Chen. Scalable collaborative filtering using cluster-based smoothing. In Proc. of SIGIR '05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. ]]R. Baraglia, C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, M. o Serrano, and F. Silvestri. A privacy preserving web recommender system. In ACM SAC, pages 559--563, New York, NY, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The wisdom of the few: a collaborative filtering approach based on expert opinions from the web

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
        July 2009
        896 pages
        ISBN:9781605584836
        DOI:10.1145/1571941

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 July 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader