skip to main content
10.1145/1639714.1639724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The impact of ambiguity and redundancy on tag recommendation in folksonomies

Published:23 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative tagging applications have become a popular tool allowing Internet users to manage online resources with tags. Most collaborative tagging applications permit unsupervised tagging resulting in tag ambiguity in which a single tag has many different meanings and tag redundancy in which several tags have the same meaning. Common metrics for evaluating tag recommenders may overestimate the utility of ambiguous tags or ignore the appropriateness of redundant tags. Ambiguity and redundancy may even burden the user with additional effort by requiring them to clarify an annotation or forcing them to distinguish between highly related items. In this paper we demonstrate that ambiguity and redundancy impede the evaluation and performance of tag recommenders. Five tag recommendation strategies based on popularity, collaborative filtering and link analysis are explored. We use a cluster-based approach to define ambiguity and redundancy and provide extensive evaluation on three real world datasets.

References

  1. A. Almeida, B. Sotomayor, J. Abaitua, and D. López-de Ipi\ na. folk2onto: Bridging the gap between social tags and ontologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Batagelj and M. Zaver\vsnik. Generalized cores. Arxiv preprint cs/0202039, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems, 30(1--7):107--117, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Brun, C. Sima, J. Hua, J. Lowey, B. Carroll, E. Suh, and E. Dougherty. Model-based evaluation of clustering validation measures. Pattern Recognition, 40(3):807--824, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Durkheim, F. Alcan, and M. Morente. De la division du travail social. Presses universitaires de France Paris, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Gemmell, A. Shepitsen, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Personalization in Folksonomies Based on Tag Clustering. Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization&Recommender Systems, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Gemmell, A. Shepitsen, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Personalizing navigation in folksonomies using hierarchical tag clustering. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Golder and B. Huberman. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Arxiv preprint cs.DL/0508082, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Hotho, R. Jaschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. BibSonomy: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System. Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, Aalborg, Denmark, July, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Hotho, R. Jaschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4011:411, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Jaschke, L. Marinho, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and G. Stumme. Tag recommendations in folksonomies. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 4702:506, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. T. Jeff Z. Pan and E. Thomas. Reducing ambiguity in tagging systems with folksonomy search expansion. In 6th European Semantic Web Conference 2009, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. E. I. Kipp and G. D. Campbell. Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems : An examination of tagging practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, November 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S.-S. Lee and H.-S. Yong. Component based approach to handle synonym and polysemy in folksonomy. In CIT '07: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pages 200--205, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Lipczak. Tag Recommendation for Folksonomies Oriented towards Individual Users. ECML PKDD Discovery Challenge, page 84, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Lloyd. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2):129--137, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. L. Marinho and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Collaborative Tag Recommendations. In Proceedings of 31st Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft fr Klassifikation (GfKl), Freiburg. Springer. Springer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Mathes. Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC (Doctoral Seminar), Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana--Champaign, December, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Mika. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(1):5--15, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworth-Heinemann Newton, MA, USA, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T. Vander Wal. Folksonomy definition and wikipedia. November 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Vig, S. Sen, and J. Riedl. Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags. In IUI '09: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 47--56, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. X. Wu, L. Zhang, and Y. Yu. Exploring social annotations for the semantic web. In WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 417--426, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C. Yeung, N. Gibbins, and N. Shadbolt. Tag meaning disambiguation through analysis of tripartite structure of folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology--Workshops, pages 3--6. IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. L. Zhang, X. Wu, and Y. Yu. Emergent semantics from folksonomies: A quantitative study. Journal on Data Semantics, pages 168--186, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The impact of ambiguity and redundancy on tag recommendation in folksonomies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RecSys '09: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems
      October 2009
      442 pages
      ISBN:9781605584355
      DOI:10.1145/1639714

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

      Upcoming Conference

      RecSys '24
      18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      October 14 - 18, 2024
      Bari , Italy

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader