skip to main content
10.1145/1645953.1645967acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior

Published:02 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Search engine switching describes the voluntarily transition from one Web search engine to another. In this paper we present a study of search engine switching behavior that combines large-scale log-based analysis and survey data. We characterize aspects of switching behavior, and develop and evaluate predictive models of switching behavior using features of the active query, the current session, and user search history. Our findings provide insight into the decision-making processes of search engine users and demonstrate the relationship between switching and factors such as dissatisfaction with the quality of the results, the desire for broader topic coverage or verification of encountered information, and user preferences. The findings also reveal sufficient consistency in users' search behavior prior to engine switching to afford accurate prediction of switching events. Predictive models may be useful for search engines who may want to modify the search experience if they can accurately anticipate a switch.

References

  1. Bartell, B.T., Cottrell, G.W., and Belew, R.K. (1994). Automatic combination of multiple ranked retrieval systems. Proc. SIGIR, 173--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Belkin, N., Cool, C., Croft, W., and Callan, J. (1993). The effect of multiple query representations on information retrieval system performance. Proc. SIGIR, 339--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Carmel, D., Yom-Tov, E., Darlow, A., and Pelleg, D. (2006). What makes a query difficult? Proc. SIGIR, 390--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cover, T.M. and Thomas, J.A. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y. and Croft, W. B. (2002). Predicting query performance. Proc. SIGIR, 299--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Downey, D., Dumais, S.T., and Horvitz, E. (2007). Models of searching and browsing: Languages, studies and application. Proc. IJCAI, 2740--2747. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Downey, D., Dumais, S.T., Liebling, D., and Horvitz, E. (2008). Understanding the relationship between searchers' queries and information goals. Proc. CIKM, 449--458. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fox, S., Karnawat, K., Mydland, M., Dumais, S.T., and White, T. (2005). Evaluating implicit measures to improve the search experience. ACM TOIS, 23(2), 147--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Grimes, C., Tang, D., and Russell, D. (2007). Query logs are not enough. Proc. Workshop on Query Log Analysis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heath, A.P. and White, R.W. (2008). Defection detection: Predicting search engine switching. Proc. WWW, 1173--1174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. (2004). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Huntington P, Nicholas D, Jamali, H.R, and Watkinson A. (2006). Obtaining subject data from log files using deep log analysis: case study OhioLINK. J. Inf. Sci., 32(4): 299--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Juan, Y.F. and Chang, C.C. (2005). An analysis of search engine switching behavior using click streams. Proc. WWW, 1050--1051. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Laxman, S., Tankasali, V., and White, R.W. (2008). Stream prediction using a generative model based on frequent epi--sodes in event sequences. Proc. SIGKDD, 453--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leskovec, J., Dumais, S., and Horvitz, E. (2007). Web projections: Learning from contextual subgraphs of the web. Proc. WWW, 471--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ling, C. and Li, C. (1998). Data mining for direct marketing: Problems and solutions. Proc. SIGKDD, 73--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mukhopadhyay, T., Rajan, U., and Telang, R. (2004). Competition between internet search engines. Proc. HICSS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2005). Search Engine Users. Accessed December 15, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Teevan, J., Dumais, S., and Liebling, D. (2008). To personalize or not to personalize: Modeling queries with variation in user intent. Proc. SIGIR, 620--627. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Telang, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., and Wilcox, R. (1999). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of internet search engine choice. Proc. Wkshp on Info. Systems and Economics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. White, R.W., Richardson, M., Bilenko, M., and Heath, A.P. (2008). Enhancing web search by promoting multiple search engine use. Proc. SIGIR, 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Zhou, Y. and Croft, W.B. (2007). Query performance prediction in web search environments. Proc. SIGIR, 543--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '09: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
      November 2009
      2162 pages
      ISBN:9781605585123
      DOI:10.1145/1645953

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Upcoming Conference

      CIKM '24
      October 21 - 25, 2024
      Boise , ID , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader