skip to main content
10.1145/1645953.1646004acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions in text

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a study of a novel summarization problem called contrastive opinion summarization (COS). Given two sets of positively and negatively opinionated sentences which are often the output of an existing opinion summarizer, COS aims to extract comparable sentences from each set of opinions and generate a comparative summary containing a set of contrastive sentence pairs. We formally formulate the problem as an optimization problem and propose two general methods for generating a comparative summary using the framework, both of which rely on measuring the content similarity and contrastive similarity of two sentences. We study several strategies to compute these two similarities. We also create a test data set for evaluating such a novel summarization problem. Experiment results on this test set show that the proposed methods are effective for generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions.

References

  1. P. Achananuparp, X. Hu, and X. Shen. The evaluation of sentence similarity measures. In DaWaK '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, pages 305--316, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Bansal, C. Cardie, and L. Lee. The power of negative thinking: Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. In Proceedings of COLING: Companion volume: Posters, pages 13--16, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, and J. Lafferty. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:2003, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Chen, F. I. Sanjuan, E. Sanjuan, and C. Weaver. Visual analysis of conflicting opinions. In IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST 2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. C. de Marneffe, A. N. Rafferty, and C. D. Manning. Finding contradictions in text. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 1039--1047, Columbus, Ohio, June 2008. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In SIGIR '99: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 50--57, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In KDD '04: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 168--177, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hu and B. Liu. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 755--760, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Hu and B. Liu. Opinion extraction and summarization on the Web. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2006), Nectar Paper Track, Boston, MA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Jindal and B. Liu. Identifying comparative sentences in text documents. In SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 244--251, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L.-W. Ku, Y.-T. Liang, and H.-H. Chen. Opinion extraction, summarization and tracking in news and blog corpora. In AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs (AAAI-CAAW), pages 100--107, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Liu. Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data (Data-Centric Systems and Applications). Springer, January 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Liu, M. Hu, and J. Cheng. Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 342--351, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Lu and C. Zhai. Opinion integration through semi-supervised topic modeling. In WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 121--130, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Malouf and T. Mullen. Graph-based user classification for informal online political discourse. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web (WICOW), Miyazaki, Japan, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Q. Mei, X. Ling, M. Wondra, H. Su, and C. Zhai. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 171--180, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis, volume 2(1-2) of Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. Now Publ., 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In EMNLP '02: Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 79--86, Morristown, NJ, USA, 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi. Wordnet: : Similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts. In AAAI, pages 1024--1025, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A.-M. Popescu and O. Etzioni. Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), pages 339--346. Association for Computational Linguistics, October 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Thomas, B. Pang, and L. Lee. Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 327--335, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. I. Titov and R. McDonald. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In WWW '08: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 111--120, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Zhai, A. Velivelli, and B. Yu. A cross-collection mixture model for comparative text mining. In KDD '04: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 743--748, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. L. Zhuang, F. Jing, X. Zhu, and L. Zhang. Movie review mining and summarization. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Generating comparative summaries of contradictory opinions in text

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CIKM '09: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
            November 2009
            2162 pages
            ISBN:9781605585123
            DOI:10.1145/1645953

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 November 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader