skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

Agent-oriented embedded electronic measuring systems

Published:01 March 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Introduction

Agent technology has attracted the attention of academia in many domains in the past decade. It is probably due to the fact that computer systems have been becoming complicated with distribution and openness characteristics. Agent-based systems, or multi-agent systems in general, are contemporary paradigm for software development. Ashri et al. claimed that "the underlying concept of decentralized, autonomous control expressed through agents that are able to communicate and cooperate to achieve goals is especially appealing for applications in heterogeneous and dynamic computing environments."

Jennings refers agent-oriented software development approach to as "decomposing the problem into multiple, autonomous components that can act and interact in flexible ways to achieve their set objectives." Jennings also advocates that agent-oriented software development approach offers the following advantages:

• Decompose a complex problem effectively so that the problem space can be divided into smaller sub-problem space;

• A natural way of modelling such systems because they are, most often, decentralized in nature; and

• Interaction among agents is appropriate for modelling the dependencies that exist in complex systems.

In the instrumentation and measurement domain, application of agent technology is still in its infancy. Dobrowiecki et al. discussed how measuring instruments are related to artificial intelligence, in particular agent technology. They presented a general idea of agent-based system which is "to order a service from an agent and to delegate any responsibility of direct control, rather than to monitor closely the progress of the problem solving". Amigoni et al. claimed that agent techniques have evolved and improved over the years such that "impacts on measurement systems whose nature and conceptual interpretation have radically changed." Real-life applications of agent technology in this domain are not well documented. It is not easy to find a successful application of agent-based instrumentation and measuring system, although PC-based distributed instrumentation and measuring systems are not uncommon. In fact, they are usually configured as client-server systems.

In this article, two real-life agent-oriented applications which are embedded measuring systems will be reviewed. In fact, the two cases are commercial products and have already been mass produced. The reasons why such distributed approach is used will be revealed. In fact, one of them is limited by the outlook design so that two individual functional units (which are agents) have to be built for each final product. On the other hand, the other one is decomposed into different independent units to simplify the software development and product design, which is a collaborative work by three independent companies. Main issues, including difficulties, that came across during the course of development of the two cases with respect to agent-oriented design will be addressed in this article.

References

  1. Amigoni, F., Brandolini, A., D'Antona, G., Ottoboni, R. and Somalvico M. Artificial intelligence in science of measurements: From measurement instruments to perceptive agencies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 52, 3, (2003) 716--723.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ashri, R., Luck, M. and d'Inverno, M. From SMART to agent systems development. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18, 2, (2005) 129--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Benetazzo, L., Bertocco, M., Ferraris, F., Ferrero, A., Offelli, C., Parvis, M. and Piuri, V. A Web-based distributed virtual laboratory. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 49, 2, (2000) 349--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cristaldi, L., Ferrero, A. and Salicone, S. A distributed system for electric power quality measurement. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 51, 4, (2002) 776--781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dobrowiecki, T.P., Louage, F., Mészáros, T.C., Román, G. and Pataki, B. Will measuring instruments turn into agents? IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 46, 4, (1997) 991--995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jennings, N.R. An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Comm. ACM 44, 4, (Apr. 2001) 35--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Papazoglou, M.P., Ribbers, P. and Tsalgatidou, A. Integrated value chains and their implications from a business and technology standpoint. Decision Support Systems 29, 4, (2000) 323--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Parunak, H.V.D. A practitioners' review of industrial agent applications. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3, 4, (2000) 389--407 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Peña, J., Hinchey, M.G. and Ruiz-Cortés, A. Multi-agent system product lines: challenges and benefits. Comm ACM 49, 12, (Dec. 2006) 82--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sahdholm, T. Agents in electronic commerce: Component technologies for automated negotiation and coalition formation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3, 2, (2000) 73--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. da Silva, V.T. and de Lucena, C.J.P. Modeling multi-agent systems. Comm ACM 50, 5, (2007) 103--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N.R. Intelligent Agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10, 2, (1995) 115--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Agent-oriented embedded electronic measuring systems

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 53, Issue 3
          March 2010
          152 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/1666420
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 March 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Popular
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format