R. Stuart Geiger
David Ribes
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we examine the social roles of software tools in the English-language Wikipedia, specifically focusing on autonomous editing programs and assisted editing tools. This qualitative research builds on recent research in which we quantitatively demonstrate the growing prevalence of such software in recent years. Using trace ethnography, we show how these often-unofficial technologies have fundamentally transformed the nature of editing and administration in Wikipedia. Specifically, we analyze "vandal fighting" as an epistemic process of distributed cognition, highlighting the role of non-human actors in enabling a decentralized activity of collective intelligence. In all, this case shows that software programs are used for more than enforcing policies and standards. These tools enable coordinated yet decentralized action, independent of the specific norms currently in force.
- Adler, B.T. and Alfaro, L.D. A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM (2007), 261--270. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Beschastnikh, I., Kriplean, T., and McDonald, D. Wikipedian Self-Governance in Action: Motivating the Policy Lens. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (2008).Google Scholar
- Bryant, S., Forte, A., and Bruckman, A. Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Supporting group work, (2005), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buriol, L.S., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Leonardi, S., and Millozzi, S. Temporal Analysis of the Wikigraph. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, IEEE (2006), 45--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Butler, B., Joyce, E., and Pike, J. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. Proceeding of the 2008 SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2008), 1101--1110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Callon, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of StBrieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1986, 196.Google Scholar
- Collins, H. and Evans, R. The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science 32, 2 (2002), 235--296.Google Scholar
- Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, ACM (2007), 32--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Demartini, G. Finding Experts Using Wikipedia. 2nd International ExpertFinder Workshop, (2007), 33--41.Google Scholar
- Emigh, W. and Herring, S.C. Collaborative Authoring on the Web: A Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, IEEE (2005), 99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Forte, A. and Bruckman, A. Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE (2008), 157. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geiger, R.S. The Social Roles of Bots and Assisted Editing Tools. Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Wikis (Wikisym), ACM (2009). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
- Kittur, A., Pendleton, B., Suh, B., and Mytkowicz, T. Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie. Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), ACM (2007).Google Scholar
- Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A., and Chi, E.H. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. Proceedings of CHI 2007, ACM (2007), 453--462. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Latour, B. Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together. Social Problems 35, 3 (1988), 298--310.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. Circulating Reference: Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest. In Pandora's Hope. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1999, 24.Google Scholar
- Orr, J. Talking about machines : an ethnography of a modern job. ILR Press, Ithaca N.Y., 1996.Google Scholar
- Pentzold, C. and Seidenglanz, S. Foucault@ Wiki: first steps towards a conceptual framework for the analysis of Wiki discourses. Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Wikis, ACM New York (2006), 59--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Potthast, M., Stein, B., and Gerling, R. Automatic Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia. In Advances in Information Retrieval. 2008, 663--668. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Priedhorsky, R., CHEN, J., Lam, S.T.K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2007 international Conference on supporting group work, ACM New York, NY, USA (2007), 259--268. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reagle Jr, J. Bug Tracking Systems as Public Spheres. Techné,11,1 (2007) 32.Google Scholar
- Sack, W., Détienne, F., Ducheneaut, N., Burkhardt, J.M., Mahendran, D., and Barcellini, F. A methodological framework for socio-cognitive analyses of collaborative design of open source software. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 15, 2 (2006), 229--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scacchi, W. Free/open source software development. Proceedings of the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering, ACM (2007), 459--468. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shukla, S. and Redmiles, D. Collaborative learning in a bug-tracking scenario. Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (1996).Google Scholar
- Smets, K., Goethals, B., and Verdonk, B. Automatic Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia: Towards a Machine Learning Approach. In AAAI Workshop on Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence, 43--48, AAAI, (2008).Google Scholar
- Stvilia, B., Twidale, M., Smith, L., and Gasser, L. Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. Proceedings of ICIQ, (2005), 442--454.Google Scholar
- Stvilia, B., Twidale, M.B., Smith, L.C., and Gasser, L. Information quality work organization in wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6 (2008), 983--1001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L.A. Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vaughan, D. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. University Of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Viegas, F. The Visual Side of Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M., and Dave, K. Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, ACM (2004). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viegas, F., Wattenberg, M., and McKeon, M. The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. In Online Communities and Social Computing. 2007, 445--454. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Welser, H., Kossinets, G., Marc, S., and Cosley, D. Finding Social Roles in Wikipedia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston, MA, AllAcademic, (2008).Google Scholar
- Zeng, H., Alhossaini, M.A., Ding, L., Fikes, R., and McGuinness, D.L. Computing Trust from Revision History. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust. ACM (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The work of sustaining order in wikipedia: the banning of a vandal
Recommendations
Operationalizing Conflict and Cooperation between Automated Software Agents in Wikipedia: A Replication and Expansion of 'Even Good Bots Fight'
This paper replicates, extends, and refutes conclusions made in a study published in PLoS ONE ("Even Good Bots Fight"), which claimed to identify substantial levels of conflict between automated software agents (or bots) in Wikipedia using purely ...
Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation
This article discusses the integration of work practice and system design. By scrutinising the unfolding discourse of workshop participants the co-construction of work practice issues as relevant design considerations is described. Through a mutual ...
Understanding infusion administration in the ICU through Distributed Cognition
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted Highlights Infusion administration can be interpreted in terms of Distributed Cognition. DiCoT can be used to study infusion pump use in an ICU from a DC perspective. DiCoT can help to improve the user interface of an ...
Comments