skip to main content
10.1145/1722149.1722154acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From hits to niches?: or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery

Published:24 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents some experiments to analyse the popularity effect in music recommendation. Popularity is measured in terms of total playcounts, and the Long Tail model is used in order to rank music artists. Furthermore, metrics derived from complex network analysis are used to detect the influence of the most popular artists in the network of similar artists.

The results from the experiments reveal that---as expected by its inherent social component---the collaborative filtering approach is prone to popularity bias. This has some consequences on the discovery ratio as well as in the navigation through the Long Tail. On the other hand, in both audio content--based and human expert--based approaches artists are linked independently of their popularity. This allows one to navigate from a mainstream artist to a Long Tail artist in just two or three clicks.

References

  1. C. Anderson. The Long Tail. Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion Verlag, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Anglade, M. Tiemann, and F. Vignoli. Complex-network theoretic clustering for identifying groups of similar listeners in p2p systems. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 41--48, Minneapolis, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.-J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. A scale-free distribution of false positives for a large class of audio similarity measures. Pattern Recognition, 41(1):272--284, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439):509--512, October 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, H. Jeong, and G. Bianconi. Power-law distribution of the world wide web. Science, 287:2115a, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. P. Cano, Ò. Celma, M. Koppenberger, and J. Martin-Buldú. Topology of music recommendation networks. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 16(013107), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Cano, M. Koppenberger, and N. Wack. An industrial-strength content-based music recommendation system. In Proceedings of 28th International ACM SIGIR Conference, Salvador, Brazil, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ò. Celma and P. Herrera. Evaluating the quality of novel recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Recommender Systems, Laussane, Switzerland, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. M. Fleder and K. Hosanagar. Blockbuster culture's next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. SSRN eLibrary, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):5--53, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Jacobson and M. Sandler. Musically meaningful or just noise? an analysis of on-line artist networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Kilkki. A practical model for analyzing long tails. First Monday, 12(5), May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. M. Kleinberg. Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406:845, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Martin-Buldú, P. Cano, M. Koppenberger, J. Almendral, and S. Boccaletti. The complex network of musical tastes. New Journal of Physics, 9(172), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. M. Mcnee, J. Riedl, and J. A. Konstan. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In Computer Human Interaction, pages 1097--1101, New York, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie. Markov chains and stochastic stability. Springer--Verlag, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. E. J. Newman. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Park, Ò. Celma, M. Koppenberger, P. Cano, and J. Martin-Buldú. The social network of contemporary popular musicians. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 17(7):2281--2288, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. J. Salganik, P. S. Dodds, and D. J. Watts. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762):854--856, February 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In A. Press, editor, Proceedings of 10th International World Wide Web Conference, pages 285--295, Hong Kong, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684):440--442, June 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. From hits to niches?: or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NETFLIX '08: Proceedings of the 2nd KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Recommender Systems and the Netflix Prize Competition
        August 2008
        33 pages
        ISBN:9781605582658
        DOI:10.1145/1722149

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 August 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader