ABSTRACT
Peer Instruction (PI) is a pedagogical technique to increase engagement in lectures. Students answer a multiple choice question (MCQ) typically using clickers (hand-held remote devices with a minimum of 5 option buttons), discuss the question with their peers, and then answer the question again. In physics, PI has years of evidence of increased conceptual learning, as measured by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI)[7]. In this experience report, we describe how PI was applied in CS1 and CS1.5 courses teaching Java. We identify specifics of the standard PI model which were adopted, adapted, or discarded for use in introductory computing, describe the process involved for the instructor, give examples of the types of questions asked of students, report on students' performance in answering these questions, reflect on the value for the instructor, and report the attitudes and opinions of the students. We conclude with observations, advice and suggested improvements.
- Beatty, I, Gerace, W., Leonard, W., Dufresne, R. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. Am. J. Physics 74 (1), January 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caldwell, J. Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6 (1): 9--20, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carter, P. An experiment with online instruction and active learning in an introductory computing course for engineers: JiTT meets CS. 14th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crouch C. and Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience. Am. J. Phys. 69 (9) 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cutts, Q., Carbone, A., and van Haaster, K. Using and Electronic Voting System to Promote Active Reflection on Coursework Feedback. In Proceedings of Intl. Conf. on Computers in Education, Melbourne, Australia, 2004.Google Scholar
- Draper, S. W. Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(2): 285--293, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hestenes, D., Wells, M. and Swackhamer, G. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher 30: 141--158, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lister, R., Fidge, C., Teague, D. Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming, SIGCSE Bulletin 41(3): 161--165 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lopez-Herrejon, R. and Schulman, M. Using Interactive Technology in a Short Java Course: An Experience Report. SIGCSE Bulletin 36(3): 203--207, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pargas, R. and Shah, D. Things are clicking in computer science courses. SIGCSE Bulletin 38(3): 474--478. 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, M., Wood, W., Adams, W., Wieman, C., Knight, J., Guild, N., Su, T. Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions. Science 323, 122, (2009).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wieman, C. and the staff of the CU and UBC Science Education Initiatives. Clicker Resource Guide: An Instructor's Guide to the Effective Use of Personal Responses Systems (Clickers) in Teaching. http://cwsei.ubc.ca.Google Scholar
- Wieman, C. http://cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/clickers.htmGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing
Recommendations
Peer instruction: do students really learn from peer discussion in computing?
ICER '11: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education researchPeer Instruction (PI) is an instructional approach that engages students in constructing their own understanding of concepts. Students individually respond to a question, discuss with peers, and respond to the same question again. In general, the peer ...
Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses?
Special Issue on Alternatives to Lecture in the Computer Science ClassroomPeer Instruction (PI) is an active learning pedagogical technique. PI lectures present students with a series of multiple-choice questions, which they respond to both individually and in groups. PI has been widely successful in the physical sciences and,...
Experience report: a multi-classroom report on the value of peer instruction
ITiCSE '11: Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationPeer Instruction (PI) has a significant following in physics, biology, and chemistry education. Although many CS educators are aware of PI as a pedagogy, the adoption rate in CS is low. This paper reports on four instructors with varying motivations and ...
Comments