skip to main content
10.1145/1734263.1734381acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Peer Instruction (PI) is a pedagogical technique to increase engagement in lectures. Students answer a multiple choice question (MCQ) typically using clickers (hand-held remote devices with a minimum of 5 option buttons), discuss the question with their peers, and then answer the question again. In physics, PI has years of evidence of increased conceptual learning, as measured by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI)[7]. In this experience report, we describe how PI was applied in CS1 and CS1.5 courses teaching Java. We identify specifics of the standard PI model which were adopted, adapted, or discarded for use in introductory computing, describe the process involved for the instructor, give examples of the types of questions asked of students, report on students' performance in answering these questions, reflect on the value for the instructor, and report the attitudes and opinions of the students. We conclude with observations, advice and suggested improvements.

References

  1. Beatty, I, Gerace, W., Leonard, W., Dufresne, R. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. Am. J. Physics 74 (1), January 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Caldwell, J. Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6 (1): 9--20, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Carter, P. An experiment with online instruction and active learning in an introductory computing course for engineers: JiTT meets CS. 14th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Crouch C. and Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience. Am. J. Phys. 69 (9) 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cutts, Q., Carbone, A., and van Haaster, K. Using and Electronic Voting System to Promote Active Reflection on Coursework Feedback. In Proceedings of Intl. Conf. on Computers in Education, Melbourne, Australia, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Draper, S. W. Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(2): 285--293, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hestenes, D., Wells, M. and Swackhamer, G. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher 30: 141--158, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lister, R., Fidge, C., Teague, D. Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming, SIGCSE Bulletin 41(3): 161--165 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lopez-Herrejon, R. and Schulman, M. Using Interactive Technology in a Short Java Course: An Experience Report. SIGCSE Bulletin 36(3): 203--207, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pargas, R. and Shah, D. Things are clicking in computer science courses. SIGCSE Bulletin 38(3): 474--478. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Smith, M., Wood, W., Adams, W., Wieman, C., Knight, J., Guild, N., Su, T. Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions. Science 323, 122, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wieman, C. and the staff of the CU and UBC Science Education Initiatives. Clicker Resource Guide: An Instructor's Guide to the Effective Use of Personal Responses Systems (Clickers) in Teaching. http://cwsei.ubc.ca.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wieman, C. http://cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/clickers.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
      March 2010
      618 pages
      ISBN:9781450300063
      DOI:10.1145/1734263

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 March 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader