skip to main content
10.1145/1734263.1734437acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance of python CS1 students in mid-level non-python CS courses

Published:10 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

If you change the CS1 language to Python, what is the impact on the rest of the curriculum? In earlier work we examined the impact of changing CS1 from C++ to Python while leaving CS2 in C++. We found that Python-prepared CS1 students fared no differently in CS2 than students whose CS1 course was in C++, even though CS2 was taught in C++ and covered the same topics as in previous years. Was that an anomaly? What happens in the next tier of courses? When our CS1 was first changed to Python there were many students who had taken CS1 in C++ still in the system. The result is that there is a cadre of students with either CS1 in Python or CS1 in C++ moving together through our curriculum. This one-time occurrence is an opportunity to study the students with many variables fixed. Our next tier of courses is a C-based computer organization course, a C++ based object-oriented software design course, and a data structures course. We found that the students who started with Python fared as well as the CS1 C++ students. As before, the best predictor of performance was their college GPA. Python versus C++ CS1 preparation was not a predictor of performance in any course. We conclude again that in our C++ based curriculum changing CS1 to Python had no negative impact on student performance and did not require any significant change in those subsequent courses.

References

  1. ABET. Criteria for accrediting computing programs: 2010-2011 cycles. http://www.abet.org, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. J. Enbody, W. F. Punch, and M. McCullen. Python cs1 as preparation for c++ cs2. In SIGCSE '09: Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 116--120, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Jukic and P. Gray. Using real data to invigorate student learning. SIGCSE Bull., 40(2):6--10, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. P. Loui. In praise of scripting: Real programming pragmatism. IEEE Computer, 41(7):22--26, July 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. D. Oldham. What happens after python in cs1? J. Comput. Small Coll., 20(6):7--13, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. project. R statistical language.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W. F. Punch and R. J. Enbody. The Practice of Computing Using Python. Pearson: Addison-Wesley, New York, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performance of python CS1 students in mid-level non-python CS courses

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 2010
        618 pages
        ISBN:9781450300063
        DOI:10.1145/1734263

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 March 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader