ABSTRACT
The use of whiteboards is pervasive across a wide range of work domains. But some of the qualities that make them successful--an intuitive interface, physical working space, and easy erasure--inherently make them poor tools for archival and reuse. If whiteboard content could be made available in times and spaces beyond those supported by the whiteboard alone, how might it be appropriated? We explore this question via ReBoard, a system that automatically captures whiteboard images and makes them accessible through a novel set of user-centered access tools. Through the lens of a seven week workplace field study, we found that by enabling new workflows, ReBoard increased the value of whiteboard content for collaboration.
- Bernstein, M., van Kleek, M., Karger, D. and schraefel, m.c. 2008. Information scraps: How and why information eludes our personal information management tools. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26, 4, 1--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brotherton, J.A. and Abowd, G.D. 2004. Lessons learned from eClass: Assessing automated capture and access in the classroom. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 11, 2, 121--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cherubini, M., Venolia, G., DeLine, R., and Ko, A. 2007. Let's Go to the Whiteboard: How and Why Software Developers use Drawings. In Proc. CHI2007, ACM, New York, NY, 557--566. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chumby. www.chumby.orgGoogle Scholar
- eBeam. www.e-beam.comGoogle Scholar
- Elrod, S., Bruce, R., Gold, R., Goldberg, D., Halasz, F., Janssen, W., Lee, D., Mccall, K., Pedersen, E., Pier, K., Tang, J., and Welch, B. 1992. "Liveboard: A Large Interactive Display Supporting Group Meetings, Presentations, and Remote Collaboration," In Proc. CHI92, ACM, New York, NY, 599--607. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golovchinsky, G., Carter, S., and Biehl, J. 2009. Beyond the Drawing Board: Toward More Effective Use of Whiteboard Content. arXiv:0911.0039v2.Google Scholar
- Huang, E.M., Mynatt, E.D., Russell, D.M., Sue, A.E. 2006. Secrets to Success and Fatal Flaws: The Design of Large-Display Groupware. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26, 1, 37--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ishii, H. 1990. TeamWorkStation: towards a seamless shared workspace. In Proc. CSCW '90. ACM, New York, NY, 13--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ju, W., Ionescu, A., Neeley, L., and Winograd, T. 2004. Where the wild things work: capturing shared physical design workspaces. In Proc. CSCW '04. ACM, New York, NY, 533--541. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kidd, A. 1994. The marks are on the knowledge worker. In Proc. CHI '94, ACM, New York, NY, 186--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mimio. www.mimio.comGoogle Scholar
- Minneman, S. and Bly, S. 1991. Managing a trois: a study of a multi--user drawing tool in distributed design work. In Proc. CHI '91. ACM, New York, NY, 217--224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moran, T.P., Chiu, P., Harrison, S., Kurtenbach, G., Minneman, S., and van Melle, W. 1996. Evolutionary engagement in an ongoing collaborative work process: a case study. In Proc. CSCW '96. ACM, New York, NY, 150--159. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moran, T. P., Palen, L., Harrison, S., Chiu, P., Kimber, D., Minneman, S., van Melle, W., and Zellweger, P. 1997. "I'll get that off the audio": a case study of salvaging multimedia meeting records. In Proc. CHI97. ACM, New York, NY, 202--209. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mynatt, E.D. "The Writing on the Wall" 1999. Proc. INTERACT '99, IOS Press, Edinburgh, UK 196--204.Google Scholar
- Mynatt, E.D., Igarashi, T., Edwards, W.K., and LaMarca, A. 1999. Flatland: New Dimensions in Office Whiteboards, Proc. CHI99, ACM, New York, NY, 346--353. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Perry, M., and O'Hara, K. 2003. Display-Based Activity in the Workplace. In Proc INTERACT'03, IOS Press, 591--598.Google Scholar
- Saund, E. "Bringing the Marks on a Whiteboard to Electronic Life," 1999. Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, 69--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- SmartBoard. www.smarttech.comGoogle Scholar
- Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google Scholar
- Tang, A., Lanir, J., Greenberg, S., and Fels, S. 2009. Supporting Transitions in Work: Informing Large Display Application Design by Understanding Whiteboard Use, In Proc. ACM GROUP 2009, ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tang, J.C. and Minneman, S. 1991. VideoWhiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration. In Proc. CHI '91. ACM, New York, NY, 315--322. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Voida, S., Mynatt, E.D., Macintyre, B., Corso, G. 2002. Integrating virtual and physical context to support knowledge workers. IEEE Pervasive Comp, 1, 3, 73--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wellner, P.D. 1993. Adaptive Thresholding for the DigitalDesk. Technical Report EPC-1993-110.Google Scholar
- Xiao, Y., C. Lasome, J. Moss, C.F. Mackenzie, and S. Faraj, Cognitive Properties of a Whiteboard: A Case Study in a Trauma Centre. In Proc. ECSCW 2001, 259--278. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Let's go from the whiteboard: supporting transitions in work through whiteboard capture and reuse
Recommendations
Flatland: new dimensions in office whiteboards
CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsFlatland is an augmented whiteboard interface designed for informal office work. Our research investigates approaches to building an augmented whiteboard in the context of continuous, long term office use. In particular, we pursued three avenues of research ...
Let's Shop Online Together: An Empirical Investigation of Collaborative Online Shopping Support
Prior studies investigating business-to-consumer e-commerce have focused predominantly on online shopping by individuals on their own, although consumers often desire to conduct their shopping activities with others. This study explores the important, ...
Let's Go to the Whiteboard (Again): Perceptions From Software Architects on Whiteboard Architecture Meetings
The whiteboard plays a crucial role in the day-to-day lives of software architects, as they frequently will organize meetings at the whiteboard to discuss a new architecture, some proposed changes to an existing architecture, a mismatch between a ...
Comments