skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753465acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Small business applications of sourcemap: a web tool for sustainable design and supply chain transparency

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces sustainable design applications for small businesses through the Life Cycle Assessment and supply chain publishing platform Sourcemap.org. This web-based tool was developed through a year-long participatory design process with five small businesses in Scotland and in New England. Sourcemap was used as a diagnostic tool for carbon accounting, design and supply chain management. It offers a number of ways to market sustainable practices through embedded and printed visualizations. Our experiences confirm the potential of web sustainability tools and social media to expand the discourse and to negotiate the diverse goals inherent in social and environmental sustainability.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p937.mov

mov

86.3 MB

References

  1. Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L., and Selker, T. 2005. Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA, April 02-07, 2005). CHI '05. ACM, New York, NY, 631--639. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055059 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blevis, E. 2007. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28-May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 503--512. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bonanni, L., Parkes, A., and Ishii, H. 2008. Future craft: how digital media is transforming product design. In CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 05-10, 2008). CHI '08. ACM, New York, NY, 2553--2564. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1358628.1358712. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bonanni, L., Hockenberry, M., Pak, A. and Ishii, H. (2009) Tools for Collective Simulation. In: Proceedings of the WebSci'09: Society On-Line, 18-20 March 2009, Athens, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blood Diamond. Dir. E. Zwick. Warner Brothers, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dada, A., Graf von Reischach, F., and Staake, T. Displaying Dynamic Carbon Footprints of Products on Mobile Phones. In Adjunct Proc. Pervasive 2008, 119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dada, A., Staake, T., and Fleish., E. The potential of UbiComp technologies to determine the environmental footprints of products. Workshops Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22-27, 2006). R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, and G. Olson, Eds. CHI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 541--550. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Giudice, F., La Rosa, G., Risitano, A. Product Design for the Environment: a Life Cycle Approach. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Goleman, Daniel. Ecological Intelligence: How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Everything. New York: Broadway Books, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Good guide: http://www.goodguide.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman, E. 2009. Three environmental discourses in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 27th international Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA, April 04-09, 2009). CHI EA '09. ACM, New York, NY, 2535--2544. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1520340.1520358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kimberley Process: http://diamondfacts.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Life-Cycle Regulations include RoHS (http://www.rohs.gov.uk/), ISO 14001 (http://www.iso.org/) and the Green Dot (http://www.gruener-punkt.de/)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leonard, A. The Story of stuff: http://www.storyofstuff.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mankoff, J.C., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S.R., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff, A., and Sengers, P. 2007. Environmental sustainability and interaction. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, USA, April 28-May 03, 2007). CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 2121--2124. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240866.1240963 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. McDonough, W. and Braungart, M. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Norris, Gregory A. Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles: Towards Life Cycle Attribute Asssessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment #11, Special Issue 1(2006), pp. 97--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Okala LCA approach: http://www.idsa.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Patagonia Footprint Chronicles: http://www.patagonia.com/web/us/footprint/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Simapro LCA software: http://www.pre.nl/simapro/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Small business carbon footprint resources include: The US EPA Climate Leaders Small Business/Low Emitter Tool (http://www.epa.gov/); Clean Air-Cool Planet Office-Based Carbon Footprint Tool (http://www.cleanair-coolplanet.org/); Ratcliff Greenhouse Gas Calculator for Facility Operations (http://www.ratcliffarch.com/)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sourcemap Carbon Catalogue: http://blog.sourcemap.org/methodology/references/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Souza Monteiro, D., Caswell, J.A., The Economics of Implementing Traceability in Beef Supply Chains (June 2004). University of Massachusetts, Amherst Working Paper No. 2004-6. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=560067Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Walmart Sustainability Consortium: http://www.sustainabilityconsortium.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wattzon provides the capability to compare one's own energy footprint to a library of user-contributed products and lifestyles: http://wattzon.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Small business applications of sourcemap: a web tool for sustainable design and supply chain transparency

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader