skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753542acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding dispute resolution online: using text to reflect personal and substantive issues in conflict

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Conflict is a natural part of human communication with implications for the work and well-being of a community. It can cause projects to stall or fail. Alternatively new insights can be produced that are valuable to the community, and membership can be strengthened. We describe how Wikipedia mediators create and maintain a 'safe space'. They help conflicting parties to express, recognize and respond positively to their personal and substantive differences. We show how the 'mutability' of wiki text can be used productively by mediators: to legitimize and restructure the personal and substantive issues under dispute; to actively and visibly differentiate personal from substantive elements in the dispute, and to maintain asynchronous engagement by adjusting expectations of timeliness. We argue that online conflicts could be effectively conciliated in other text-based web communities, provided power differences can be controlled, by policies and technical measures for maintaining special 'safe' conflict resolution spaces.

References

  1. Billings, M. and Watts, L.A. A safe space to vent: Conciliation and conflict in distributed teams. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Springer Verlag, Limerick, Ireland, (2007), 139--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bruckman, A., Danis, C., Lampe, C., Sternberg, J. and Waldron, C. Managing deviant behavior in online communities. Extended Abstracts of CHI2006, ACM Press, New York, (2006), 21--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Burke, M. and Kraut, R. Taking up the mop: identifying future wikipedia administrators. Proceedings of CHI2008, ACM Press, New York, (2008), 3441--3446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bush, R.A.B. and Folger, J.P. The Promise of Mediation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, B., Joyce, E. and Pike, J. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia. Proceedings of CHI2008, ACM Press, New York, (2008), 1101--1110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carnevale, P.J. and Probst, T.M. Social Values and Social Conflict in Creative Problem Solving and Categorisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 7(1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, H.H. Using Language. CUP, Cambridge, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L. and Riedle, J. How oversight improves member-maintained communities. Proceedings of CHI2005, ACM Press, New York, (2005), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Daft, R. and Lengel, R.H. A proposed integration among organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 321986). 554--571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Deutsch, M. A Theoretical Perspective on Conflict and Conflict Resolution. Conflict Management and Problem Solving: interpersonal to international applications., Pinter, London, (1987), 38--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterbrook, S. (ed.), CSCW: Cooperation or conflict? Springer Verlag, London, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Erickson, T. Persistent Conversation: Discourse as Document. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 4(1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Honeyman, C., Baker, M.F., Bellman, H.S., Bradley, S., Honoroff, B., Lewis, M.K., Maida, P.R., McEwan, C.A., McKnight, M., Goulet-Orenstein, S., Pou Jr., C., Riskin, L.L., Sander, F.E., Singer, L.R. and Smith, M. Performance-based assessment: A methodology for use in selecting, training and evaluating mediators. National Institute for Dispute Resolution, Washington, DC, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jehn, K.A. A Multi-Method Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 401995). 256--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Katash and Rifkin Online Dispute Resolution: resolving conflict in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Fransisco, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kiesler, S., Siegal, J. and McGuire, T.W. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 10(1984). 1123--1134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kittur, A., Suchman, L., Pendleton, B.A. and Chi, E. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. Proceedings of CHI2007, ACM Press, New York, (2007), 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kressel, K. Mediation. Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Jossey-Bass, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., McDonald, D.W. and Golder, S.A. Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation. Proceedings of GROUP2007, ACM Press, New York, (2007), 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lampe, C. and Johnston, E. Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. Proceedings of GROUP 2005, ACM Press, New York, (2005), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lampe, C. and Resnick, P. Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. Proceedings of CHI2004, ACM Press, New York, (2004), 543--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Laue, J. The Emergence of Institutionalisation of Third-Party Roles in Conflict. Conflict Management and Problem Solving: interpersonal to international applications., Pinter, London, (1987), 17 -- 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Picard, C., Bishop, P., Ramkay, R. and Sargent, N. The Art and Science of Mediation. Emond Montgomery Publications, Toronto, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Poole, M.S., Homes, M. and Desanctis, G. Conflict management and group decision support systems. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, Oregon, (1988), 227--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Spears, R., Lea, M. and Postmes, T. Social psychological theories of computer-mediated communication: social pain or social gain? The handbook of language and social psychology, Wiley, Chichester, (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thom-Santelli, J., Cosley, D. and Gay, G. What's mine is mine: territoriality in collaborative authoring. Proceedings of CHI2009, ACM Press, New York, (2009), 1481--1484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Walther, J.B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23 1(1996). 3--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Walther, J.B. and Parks, M.R. Cues Filtered-Out, Cues Filtered-In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships. Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, Sage, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Winslade, J. and Monk, G. Narrative Mediation: A New Approach to Conflict Resolution. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Understanding dispute resolution online: using text to reflect personal and substantive issues in conflict

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader