skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753581acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where is my team: supporting situation awareness with tactile displays

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A group of friends visiting a crowded and noisy music festival is an example of a situation where knowing the location of other people is important, but where external factors, such as darkness or noise, can limit the ability to keep track of the others. By combining theories about situation awareness and cognitive processing we inferred that communicating information via the sense of touch is a promising approach in such situations. We therefore investigated how to present the location of several people using a tactile torso display. In particular we focused on encoding spatial distances in the tactile signals. We experimentally compared encoding spatial distances in the rhythm, duration, and intensity of a tactile signal. Our findings show that all parameters are suited to encode distances. None of it was clearly outperformed. We then embedded our tactile location encoding into a fast-paced 3D multiplayer game. In this game, team play and the awareness of the team members' locations are crucial for the success in the game. The results provides evidence that the locations of the team members could be processed effectively despite the game's high cognitive demands. In addition, the team equipped with the tactile display showed a better team play and a higher situation awareness.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1753581.mp4

mp4

98.8 MB

References

  1. S. Brewster and L. M. Brown. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proc. of the Australasian conference on user interface, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Chan, K. MacLean, and J. McGrenere. Designing haptic icons to support collaborative turn-taking. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 66:333--355, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. W. Cholewiak, J. C. Brill, and A. Schwab. Vibrotactile localization on the abdomen: effects of place and space. Perception and Psychophysics., 66:970--987, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Duistermaat, L. R. Elliot, J. B. F. van Erp, and R. E. S. Human factor issues in complex system performance, chapter Tactile land navigation for dismounted soldiers, pages 43--53. Shaker publishing, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. T. Durso and A. R. Dattel. SPAM: The Real-Time Assessment of SA, chapter 8, pages 137--154. Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. R. Endsley. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factor, 37(1):32--64, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. R. Endsley. A comparative analysis of sagat and sart for evaluations of situation awareness. In 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, Oktober 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. R. Endsley, B. Bolté, and D. G. Jones. Designing for situation awareness -- An approach to User-Centered Design. Taylor & Francis, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. W. Lindeman, J. L. Sibert, E. Mendez-Mendez, S. Patil, and D. Phifer. Effectiveness of directional vibrotactile cuing on a building--clearing task. In CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 271--280, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. L. McDaniel, S. Krishna, D. Colbry, and S. Panchanathan. Using tactile rhythm to convey interpersonal distances to individuals who are blind. In CHI EA '09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 4669--4674, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Pielot and S. Boll. Tactile Wayfinder: comparison of tactile waypoint navigation with commercial pedestrian navigation systems. In The Eighth International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Helsinki, Finland, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Pielot, N. Henze, and S. Boll. Supporting map-based wayfinding with tactile cues. In MobileHCI '09: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pages 1--10, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Pielot, N. Henze, and S. Boll. Sensing your social net at night. In Night and darkness: Interaction after dark. Workshop at the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (CHI) 2008, April 5-10, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. A. Ross and B. B. Blasch. Wearable interfaces for orientation and wayfinding. In Assets '00: Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies, pages 193--200, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Rupert. An instrumentation solution for reducing spatial disorientation mishaps. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE, 19(2):71--80, Mar/Apr 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. Salmon, N. Stanton, G. Walker, and D. Green. Situation awareness measurement: A review of applicability for c4i environments. In Applied Ergonomics, volume 37, pages 225--238, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. J. J. M. Smets, G. M. te Brake, M. A. Neerincx, and J. Lindenberg. Effects of mobile map orientation and tactile feedback on navigation speed and situation awareness. In MobileHCI '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pages 73--80, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. B. F. Van Erp. Guidelines for the use of vibro-tactile displays in human computer interaction. In Proceedings of Eurohaptics 2002, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. B. F. Van Erp. Presenting directions with a vibrotactile torso display. Ergonomics, 48:302--313, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. B. F. Van Erp, E. L. Groen, and J. E. Bos. A tactile cockpit instrument supports the control of self-motion during spatial disorientation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48:219--228, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. B. F. Van Erp, H. A. H. C. van Veen, C. Jansen, and T. Dobbins. Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(2):106--117, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. A. H. C. Van Veen, M. Spapé, and J. B. F. Van Erp. Waypoint navigation on land: Different ways of coding distance to the next waypoint. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference EuroHaptics 2004, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. C. D. Wickens. Processing resources in attention. In Processing resource in attention. London: Academic, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Where is my team: supporting situation awareness with tactile displays

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2010
          2690 pages
          ISBN:9781605589299
          DOI:10.1145/1753326

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 April 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader