skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motivations to participate in online communities

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A consistent theoretical and practical challenge in the design of socio-technical systems is that of motivating users to participate in and contribute to them. This study examines the case of Everything2.com users from the theoretical perspectives of Uses and Gratifications and Organizational Commitment to compare individual versus organizational motivations in user participation. We find evidence that users may continue to participate in a site for different reasons than those that led them to the site. Feelings of belonging to a site are important for both anonymous and registered users across different types of uses. Long-term users felt more dissatisfied with the site than anonymous users. Social and cognitive factors seem to be more important than issues of usability in predicting contribution to the site.

References

  1. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology (63). 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brush, A.J.B., Wang, X., Turner, T.C. and Smith, M.A. Assessing differential usage of usenet social accounting meta-data Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V., and Kraut, R. Introductions and Requests: Rhetorical Strategies That Elicit Response in Online Communities. Third International Conference on Communities & Technologies, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, B.S. Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures. Info. Sys. Research, 12 (4). 346--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. and Pearo, L.K. A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (3). 241--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eastin, M.S. and LaRose, R. Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (1). 0--0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Emigh, W. and Herring, S.C., Collaborative authoring on the Web: A genre analysis of online encyclopedias. in Thirty-Eighth Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), (Los Alamitos, 2005), IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jin, X.-L., Cheung, C.M., Lee, M.K. and Chen, H. User Information Satisfaction with a Knowledge-Based Virtual Community: An Empirical Investigation Proceedings of the 1st world summit on The Knowledge Society: Emerging Technologies and Information Systems for the Knowledge Society, Springer-Verlag, Athens, Greece, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Joinson, A.N., Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of facebook. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM Press, 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Karau, S.J. and Williams, K.D. Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4). 681--705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A. and Chi, E.H., He Says, She Says: Conflict and Coordination in Wikipedia. in Human Factors in Computing Systems, (San Jose, CA, 2007), ACM Press, 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kline, R.B. Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kollock, P. The economies of online cooperation. in Smith, M.A. and Kollock, P. eds. Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge, New York, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lakhani, K.R. and Wolf, R.G. Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. in Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S. and Lakhani, K.R. eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lampe, C. and Johnston, E. 2005. Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, November 06 -- 09, 2005). GROUP '05. ACM, New York, NY, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., Rashid, A.M., Resnick, P. and Kraut, R. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D. and Preece, J. Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 6 (1). 7--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nonnecke, B. and Preece, J. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nov, O. 2007. What motivates Wikipedians? Commun. ACM 50, 11 (Nov. 2007), 60--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. O'Mahony, S. and Ferraro, F. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (5). 1079--1106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rayburn II, J. D. Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication Research, 7(2). 161--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Papacharissi, Z. and Rubin, A.M. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44 (2). 175--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S.K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J. Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, ACM, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rafaeli, S., Hayat, T. and Y., A. Knowledge Building and Motivations in Wikipedia: Participation as "Ba". in Ricardo, F.J. ed. Cyberculture and New Media, Rodopi, New York, 2009, 52--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G. and Soroka, V., De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ren, Y., Kraut, R., and Kiesler, S. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3):377--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruggiero, T.E. Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3 (1). 3 -- 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Soroka, V. and Rafaeli, S. Invisible participants: How cultural capital relates to lurking behavior Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tajfel, H. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social science information, 13(2), 65--93.29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner, J. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in group processes, 2, 77--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilkinson, D.M. Strong regularities in online peer production Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, ACM, Chicago, Il, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Motivations to participate in online communities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader