skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1754096acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Empowering products: personal identity through the act of appropriation

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the relationship between personal identity and the act of appropriating digital objects in the home--specifically do-it-yourself--to inform the design of empowering products. It reports ongoing research and provides a preliminary analysis of the Steampunk movement as a case study for personal appropriation. Appropriation-identity design guidelines are provided as a result of the data analysis.

References

  1. Ahde, P. 2007. Appropriation by adornments: personalization makes the everyday life more pleasant. In Proc. DPPI '07. ACM Press, 148--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardzell, S., Rege, R., Huang, C., Chaudry, B. 2009. Designing for the cultural other: Materiality and technology in Indian homes. In Proc. DPPI '09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Battarbee, K. and Mattelmaki, T. 2002. Meaningful product relationships. In Proc. DE '03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, G., Blythe, M., Sengers, P. 2005. Making by making strange: defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 12 (2), 149--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bralker, B. 2007. Steampunking technology: a subculture hand-tools today's gadgets with Victorian style. In Newsweek Web Exclusive, October 31, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E., and Williams, A. 2009. DIY for CHI: methods, communities, and values of reuse and customization. In CHI EA '09. ACM Press, 4823 -- 2826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bulloff, L. 2009. The Chronabelle, an interview. In Steampunk Magazine: Lifestyle, Mad Science, Theory & Fiction 5 (2009), 16--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Callero, P. 2003. The sociology of the self. In Annual Review of Sociology 29, 115--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., and Murphy, J. 2001. Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In Proc. ACIS '01. Paper 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Catastrophone Orchestra and Arts Collective. 2007. What then, is steampunk? Colonizing the past so we can dream the future. In Steampunk Magazine: Lifestyle, Mad Science, Theory & Fiction 1 (2007), 4--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Diana, C. 2008. How I learned to stop worrying and love the hackers. In Interactions 15 (2), 46--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dix, A. 2007. Designing for appropriation. In Proc. HCI '07. British Computer Society, 27--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fleming, E. 1974. Artifact study: a proposed model. In Winterthur Portfolio 9 (1974), 153--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Galloway, A., Brucker-Cohen, J., Gaye, L., Goodman, E., and Hill, D. 2004. Design for hackability. In Proc. DIS '04. ACM Press, 363--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hell, K. 2009. Clockworks and Carbon: The Fantastical Escapades of the Steampunk Aesthetic. Morbid Outlook, July 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoskins, J. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. Routledge: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mackay, H. and Gillespie, G. 1992. Extending the social shaping of technology approach: ideology and appropriation. In Social Studies of Science 22 (4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. March, W., Jacobs, M., and Salvador, T. 2005. Designing technology for community appropriation. In Proc. CHI EA '05. ACM Press, 2126--2127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Miller, D. 1998. Material Culture: Why Some Things Matter. U of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Odom, W. and Pierce, J. 2009. Improving with age: designing enduring interactive products. In Proc. CHI EA '09. ACM Press, 3793--3798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Olson, Eric T., "Personal Identity", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Oring, E. 1994. The arts, artifacts, and artifices of identity. In The Journal of American Folklore 107 (424), 211--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Pearce, S. Interpreting Objects and Collections. Routledge: New York and London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Poeter, D. 2008. Steampunk's subculture revealed. In The San Francisco Chronicle (July 6, 2008), F1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ratt, M. 2007. Putting the punk back into steampunk. In Steampunk Magazine: Lifestyle, Mad Science, Theory & Fiction 1 (2007), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosner, D. and Bean, J. 2009. Learning from IKEA hacking: I'm not one to decoupage a tabletop and call it a day. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM Press, 419--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Salovaara, A. 2009. Studying appropriation of everyday technologies: a cognitive approach. In Proc. CHI EA '09. ACM Press, 3141--3144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sengers, P. and Gaver, B. 2006. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proc. DIS '06. ACM Press, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Silver, J. 2009. Awakening to maker methodology: the metamorphosis of a curious caterpillar. In Proc. IDC '09. ACM Press, 242--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Steel, S. 2008. Steam Dream. The Phoenix, May 19, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sterling, B. 2009. The User's Guide to Steampunk. In Steampunk Magazine: Lifestyle, Mad Science, Theory & Fiction 5 (2009), 30--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Verbeek, P. and Kockelkoren, P. 1998. The things that matter. In Design Issues 14 3 (1998), 28--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wakkary, R. and Maestri, L. 2007. The resourcefulness of everyday design. In Proc. C&C '07. ACM Press, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Empowering products: personal identity through the act of appropriation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader